My list could go on and on. Schulz’s theory is too sweeping; her definition of literature is too narrow. She fails to consider the many splendid nature and travel books in which weather is central.
Wednesday, November 25, 2015
November 23, 2015 Issue
Kathryn Schulz’s "Writers in the Storm," in this week’s
issue, tracks what she calls “the over-all decline of weather in literature.”
She writes, “While meteorology was advancing, then, the role of weather in
literature began to decline.” This doesn’t mesh with my own reading experience.
My favorite books brim with weather:
The first snowstorm blew in from the north, and crows
crossed the sky before it like thrown black socks. [Ian Frazier, Great Plains, 1989]
The day was growing overcast, and we walked out of the woods
and headed toward the Meadowlands despite Victor’s misgivings. [Robert
Sullivan, The Meadowlands, 1998]
Woke up in brilliant sunshine in the shaking train, going
through the Rocky Mountain Trench, as it is called, a long straight fault
valley on the west slopes, with snow ranges on either side, an area where they
were building a road in 1960 – but still no road. [Edward Hoagland, Notes from the Century Before, 1969]
The Arctic sun – penetrating, intense – seems not so much to
shine as to strike. [John McPhee, Coming
into the Country, 1977]
On sunny, crystal clear mornings in the fall, when it is
possible to see into the water, he gets in one of his boats and rows out into
the flats and catches some river shrimp. [Joseph Mitchell, The Bottom of the Harbor, 1959]
Afternoon light, clinging to the land, seemed to flee to the
snowy sky as twilight drew on. [Verlyn Klinkenborg, Making Hay, 1986]
The wind is steady out of the east, a strong breeze of maybe
thirty to thirty-five. [Anthony Bailey, The
Outer Banks, 1989]
The cabin emerges silently up ahead in the blowing snow as
the storm closes in. [Barry Lopez, Arctic
Dreams, 1986]
The rising sun shot hard, bright beams straight down the
canyon east to west, bleeding in a muscular heat. [Sallie Tisdale, Stepping Westward, 1991]
But the boat was safe here, displaced from the world in its
cocoon of fog, and I was glad to stay. [Jonathan Raban, Passage to Juneau, 1999]
My list could go on and on. Schulz’s theory is too sweeping; her definition of literature is too narrow. She fails to consider the many splendid nature and travel books in which weather is central.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment