Introduction

What is The New Yorker? I know it’s a great magazine and that it’s a tremendous source of pleasure in my life. But what exactly is it? This blog’s premise is that The New Yorker is a work of art, as worthy of comment and analysis as, say, Keats’s “Ode on a Grecian Urn.” Each week I review one or more aspects of the magazine’s latest issue. I suppose it’s possible to describe and analyze an entire issue, but I prefer to keep my reviews brief, and so I usually focus on just one or two pieces, to explore in each the signature style of its author. A piece by Nick Paumgarten is not like a piece by Jill Lepore, and neither is like a piece by Ian Frazier. One could not mistake Collins for Seabrook, or Bilger for Galchen, or Mogelson for Kolbert. Each has found a style, and it is that style that I respond to as I read, and want to understand and describe.

Showing posts with label John Kinsella. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Kinsella. Show all posts

Saturday, December 23, 2017

2017 Year in Review


Vincent Mahé, “The Tank” (2017)


















There are highlights aplenty. But before we get started, let’s have a drink – something strong and refreshing. How about a Jonn the Beachcomber? Remember that one? McKenna Stayner described it as “slurpy and delicious, with three types of rum, allspice, grenadine, pineapple, lime, and crushed ice in a goblet the size of a fishbowl, topped with fruit salad and studded with heart-shaped straws” (“Bar Tab: Super Power,” February 27, 2017).  Yes, I’ll have one of those, please.

While we’re on the subject of drinks, I just want to say that this year’s “Bar Tab” and “Tables For Two” columns were terrific – tremendous sources of delicious sensual description. My favorite “Tables For Two” was Becky Cooper’s “Mermaid Spa” (March 6, 2017). It’s so good, I’m going to quote it in full:

The smell of chlorine emanating from the concrete building is the first hint that Mermaid Spa, in Coney Island, isn’t Spa Castle. There are no crystal rooms, no “color therapy” experiences, and, thankfully, no uniforms reminiscent of a totalitarian regime. This is a Ukrainian-Russian community center, a blustery twenty-minute walk from the subway, as traditional as banyas get in New York City, with a clientele that takes its sweating very seriously. There is, happily, also a restaurant, which serves some solid Russian classics.

The dining room, guarded by golden mermaids, is built around a hot tub. There are older men in groups; younger, shiny men in groups; and fit couples throwing back plastic pints of beer. Everyone is wearing towels, and most are in felt hats that, counterintuitively, help with the heat. Claim a table—it’s yours for the day—and head into the sauna. Sweat until you can’t stand it, and escape to the cold shower. Pull the chain and a torrent of ice water rushes over you. Then go to the steam room and get lost in the fog, before plunging into the ice pools. Jump out, gasp for breath, and feel your head pound with shock and relief. Repeat until you’re jelly, and then it’s time to eat.

Many tables stick with giant bottles of water and platters of fresh fruit. But you came for the food, so go for it. The large meat dishes—lamb leg, beef stroganoff, chicken tabaka—are hefty in a way that seems ill-advised in the setting. The hot appetizers are a better idea. The borscht is rich and thick. The garlicky French fries, piled on a sizzling iron skillet, though not exactly what you’d picture eating in a bathing suit, are a banya staple. Even more traditional are the pelmeni, filled with beef, lamb, and veal, and topped with mushroom gravy, which are addictive until they congeal at room temperature. Luckily, the dish is too good to leave for long. The best, though, are the cold appetizers, especially the pickled herring or, if you dare, the salo—raw pig lard, frozen and sliced thin. The procedure is half the fun: Layer it over some brown bread. Salt it. Pick up a raw garlic clove. Salt that. Bite one, then the other. The sharp fire of the raw garlic gives way to the sweetness of the bread, and to the soothing fat as it melts. It’s more bracing than the ice pools.

On the way out, do yourself a favor and stop by the beach, whose winter charm doesn’t get enough credit. The steam rises off your skin. The coastline extends as far as you can see, populated by no one.

That is tremendously alive, and it's the knowing sensual instructions (“Sweat until you can’t stand it,” “Pull the chain,” “Repeat until you’re jelly,” “Salt it,” “Pick up a raw garlic clove,” “Bite one, then the other”) that make it so.

For me, the best fact piece of the year was Luke Mogelson’s “The Avengers of Mosul” (February 6, 2017), a brilliant, brutal, immersive account of Mogelson’s experience traveling with an Iraqi SWAT team as it fights to liberate Mosul from ISIS occupation. Here’s a sample:

The snipers eventually quit for the night, but they resumed with gusto in the morning. The SWAT-team members who were not stationed on the roof went to the road behind the house. Bullets zinged up the alley leading to the cemetery. Every now and then, the men backed a Humvee into the alley and aimed a few bursts from the Dushka at Al Quds; they also launched grenades from a turret-mounted MK19. The moment the Humvee pulled back behind cover, more bullets hit the house and the houses around it. They kicked up dirt and slapped against walls. They pierced an empty fuel tanker. They shook the branches of a tree and cut down leaves. They ricocheted off power-line poles, ringing them like bells.

“The Avengers of Mosul” is an extraordinary piece of writing, one of the best I’ve read in a long time. I relish the way it unfolds sequentially without flashbacks. I relish its factual style. I relish its focus on the SWAT-team members. Most of all, I relish its details, e.g., a Humvee’s interior (“I crammed into Mezher’s vehicle, sharing a seat with a corporal in a black balaclava. We were wedged in amid ammo boxes, ammo belts, and the feet of another policeman, who stood in the turret behind a Dushka, a Russian heavy machine gun”); a medic’s cigarette ash (“He spoke excellent English, and worked with calm efficiency, often while smoking a cigarette, the ash falling on his patients”); the SWAT team’s deputy commander sitting on the edge of a bed “casually flipping a hand grenade around his finger”; inside a new aid station (“The fake-gold pages of a Koran, draped with a garland of plastic roses, were mounted on the wall, above bags of saline hanging from protruding screws”); the way a soldier puts his foot on a prisoner’s head (“The soldier in the cap twisted his boot back and forth, as if putting out a cigarette”); the ringtone of the Swat-team commander’s phone (“His phone kept ringing: the tone was the theme song from the movie ‘Halloween’ ”); a woman suturing a boy’s face with needle and thread (“It looked as if she’d dipped her hands in a bucket of red paint. I cut the thread and tried to shoo her off. A minute later, while attending to the wounds on the man’s legs, I looked up and saw that she was stitching him again”).

Mogelson’s follow-up piece, “Dark Victory,” (November 6, 2017), on the battle to expel ISIS from Raqqa, is pretty damn good, too. It features stunning color photos by Mauricio Lima, at least two of which will be on my “Best of 2017: Photography” list, which I’ll be posting in the next few days.

Mauricio Lima, "Female Fighters for the Syrian Democratic Forces" (2017)














My favorite New Yorker writer, Ian Frazier, had a great year, producing three excellent pieces: “High-Rise Greens” (January 9, 2017), “Drive Time” (August 28, 2017), and “Clear Passage” (November 13, 2017). “Drive Time,” a personal history piece on the pleasure Frazier gets from driving in New York City, contains a wonderful description of an early-morning drive he takes from his New Jersey home, across the George Washington Bridge, into the Bronx (“The slanted early-morning sun amid the pillars colors the sides of bread trucks moving slowly on their deliveries”), across the Harlem River on the Madison Avenue Bridge, into Manhattan on the F.D.R. Drive (“cruising by the high-rises and the hospitals of the Upper East Side and under the tower of the United Nations”), across the Brooklyn Bridge (“maybe the most glorious bridge in the world, its cables radiating from their junction points at the top of its towers like beams of light”), into Brooklyn, up the ramp to the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway, onto the Belt Parkway to J.F.K. Airport, then, via the Belt Parkway, back to Brooklyn, up the ramp to the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge, across the bridge, onto the Staten Island Expressway, then across the Goethals Bridge and onto the New Jersey Turnpike, at which point, Frazier writes,

Here is the best part of the route, because when the landing patterns at Newark Airport are configured in a certain way the planes coming in fly parallel to the turnpike and directly above it. If everything is in synch, I can be motoring up the highway among lanes of cars and trucks (the turnpike is busy at any hour) with the freight-train tracks on the right and all the earthbound vectors lining up as an incoming jet roars overhead, outdistances everybody, diverges to the left, and sets down on a shimmery runway. The music on the radio can be helpful here; I’ve found that a big, anthemic prog-rock song makes a good accompaniment. Every tristate-area driver should experience this cool convergence once in a while.

After that, Frazier takes the I-78 west, Garden State Parkway north to Exit 151, then west on Watchung Avenue, south on Grove Street, and he’s home—“five boroughs, four major bridges, two airports, two states, and back in time for breakfast.”

Quite a trip! I enjoyed it immensely.

Three other reporting pieces that afforded me enormous pleasure: Gary Shteyngart’s “Time Out” (March 20, 2017), Nick Paumgarten’s “Singer of Secrets” (August 28, 2017), and Burkhard Bilger’s “Feathered Glory” (September 25, 2017). It was great to see Bilger back in the magazine after a lengthy absence.

Speaking of absences, where is Ben McGrath? His last New Yorker piece was the extraordinary “The Wayfarer” (December 14, 2015), which was #1 on my “Best of 2015” list. And his superb “The White Wall” (April 22, 2013) was #1 on my “Best of 2013.” I miss his work.

My favorite book reviewer, James Wood, didn’t appear in the magazine until June. I was worried he’d quit or been let go. But when he did finally show up, he delivered a masterpiece – The Other Side of Silence” (June 5 & 12, 2017), a review of W. G. Sebald’s fiction. It contains a fascinating discussion of the way Sebald uses photographs in his novels. Wood says,

Few writers have used photographs in quite the way Sebald does, scattering them, without captions, throughout the text, so that the reader can’t be sure, exactly, how the writing and the photographs relate to each other, or, indeed, whether the photographs disclose what they purport to.

Brilliantly, Wood connects Sebald’s Austerlitz photos with what he says is Austerlitz’s central theme – retrieval. He writes that the effort of retrieval can be felt “whenever we stare at one of Sebald’s dusky, uncaptioned photographs, and it is not coincidental that photography plays the largest role in the two Sebald books that deal centrally with the Holocaust, The Emigrants and Austerlitz.”  

Referring to Austerlitz, Wood writes,

What does it mean to stare at a photograph of a little boy who is “supposed” to be Jacques Austerlitz, when “Jacques Austerlitz” is nothing more than a fictional character invented by W. G. Sebald? Who is the actual boy who stares at us from the cover of this novel? We will probably never know. It is indeed an eerie photograph, and Sebald makes Austerlitz say of it:

I have studied the photograph many times since, the bare, level field where I am standing, although I cannot think where it was. . . . I examined every detail under a magnifying glass without once finding the slightest clue. And in doing so I always felt the piercing, inquiring gaze of the page boy who had come to demand his dues, who was waiting in the gray light of dawn on the empty field for me to accept the challenge and avert the misfortune lying ahead of him.

The boy does seem to be demanding something from us, and I imagine that this is why, when Sebald came across the photograph, he chose it. Presumably, he found it in a box of old postcards and snapshots, in one of the antique shops he enjoyed rummaging through. In 2011, while working on an introduction to “Austerlitz,” I had a chance to examine the Sebald archive—manuscripts, old photographs, letters, and the like—at the Deutsches Literaturarchiv, in Marbach am Neckar, and there I found the postcard that bears the boy’s image. Eager for a “clue,” I turned it over. On the reverse side, there was nothing more than the name of an English town and a price, written in ink: “Stockport: 30p.”

Amazing! The origin of Austerlitz is sourced in the image on this found postcard. In the novel, Jacques Austerlitz is rescued by the Kindertransport; he averts the misfortune lying ahead of him. Of Sebald’s writing, Wood says, “What animates his project is the task of saving the dead, retrieving them through representation.”

Another critical piece from 2017 that sticks in my memory is Alex Ross’s reverberant “Tank Music” (July 24, 2017), in which Ross attends a concert at the Tank in Rangely, Colorado. The Tank is just that – a sixty-five-foot-tall water tank that sound artist Bruce Odland has converted into a performance venue and recording studio. Ross describes the unique sound it makes:

When my eyes had adjusted to the gloom—a few portals in the roof provide shafts of light during the day—I picked up a rubber-coated hammer and banged a pipe. The sound rang on and on: the reverberation in the space lasts up to forty seconds. But it’s not a cathedral-style resonance, which dissipates in space as it travels. Instead, sound seems to hang in the air, at once diffused and enriched. The combination of a parabolic floor, a high concave roof, and cylindrical walls elicits a dense mass of overtones from even a footfall or a cough. I softly hummed a note and heard pure harmonics spiralling around me, as if I had multiplied into several people who could sing.

Ross is inside the Tank listening to the vocal ensemble Roomful of Teeth perform a piece by Judah Adashi when a storm breaks:

Gusts buffeting the exterior created an apocalyptic bass rumble; lashes of rain sounded like a hundred snare drums. The voices bobbed on the welter of noise, sometimes disappearing into it and sometimes riding above. As Adashi’s music subsided, the storm subsided in turn. In my experience, music has never seemed closer to nature.

That “Gusts buffeting the exterior created an apocalyptic bass rumble; lashes of rain sounded like a hundred snare drums” is very beautiful – one of my favorite sentences of 2017.

One more highlight of 2017: John Kinsella’s unforgettable “Milking the Tiger Snake” (January 9, 2017). Here it is in full:

Fangs through a balloon, an orange balloon
stretched over a jam-jar mouth scrubbed-up
bush standard—fangs dripping what looks
like semen, which is venom, one of the most
deadly, down grooves and splish splash
onto the lens of the distorting glass-bottom
boat we look up into, head of tiger
snake pressed flat with the bushman’s
thumb—his scungy hat that did Vietnam,
a bandolier across his matted chest
chocked with cartridges—pistoleer
who takes out ferals with secretive
patriotic agendas. And we kids watch
him draw the head of the fierce snake,
its black body striped yellow. “It will rear
up like a cobra if cornered, and attack,
attack!” he stresses as another couple
of droplets form and plummet. And when
we say, “Mum joked leave them alone
and they’ll go home,” he retorts, “Typical
bloody woman, first to moan if she’s bit,
first to want a taste of the anti-venom
that comes of my rooting these black
bastards out, milking them dry, down
to the last drop.” Tiger snake’s eyes
peer out crazily targeting the neck
of the old coot with his dirty mouth,
its nicotine garland. He from whom
we learn, who shows us porno
and tells us what’s what. Or tiger snake
out of the wetlands, whip-cracked
by the whip of itself until its back is broke.

My god, that’s a great poem! What makes it great is Kinsella’s use of words I can see (“fangs through a balloon, an orange balloon,” “stretched over a jam-jar mouth,” “fangs dripping what looks / like semen, which is venom,” “down grooves and splish splash / onto the lens of the distorting glass-bottom / boat,” “head of tiger / snake pressed flat with the bushman’s / thumb,” “scungy hat that did Vietnam,” “a bandolier across his matted chest / chocked with cartridges,” “the fierce snake, / its black body striped yellow,” “droplets form and plummet,” “the old coot with his dirty mouth, / its nicotine garland,” “tiger snake / out of the wetlands, whip-cracked / by the whip of itself until its back is broke”). These words jump to life as I read them. And I love the poem’s spontaneity; it has the feel of actual encounter, naked experience, quickly sketched as it’s happening, or immediately afterwards, while the details are still fresh.

And now, with the few drops of Jonn the Beachcomber still left in my goblet, I want to propose a toast: Here’s to the greatest magazine in the world! New Yorker without end, amen!

Saturday, July 1, 2017

Imaginary Interview: On the Making of "Mid-Year Top Ten (2017)"


Dolly Faibyshev, "Mermaid Spa"












This year’s “Mid-Year Top Ten (2017)” is the eighth in a series that began in 2010, the year this blog was launched. All were composed by New Yorker & Me staff writer John MacDougall. We asked him to reflect on his work.

What’s the point of these lists?

They’re a way for me to take stock of my New Yorker reading experience.

What criteria do you use to pick and rank the pieces?

Pleasure is my guide.

Well, what do you look for in a piece of writing? What gives you pleasure?

Are you familiar with James Wood’s definition of “thisness”?

Refresh my memory.

Thisness is any detail that draws abstraction toward itself and seems to kill that abstraction with a puff of palpability, any detail that centers our attention with its concretion. Wood wrote that in his great How Fiction Works. It’s one of my touchstones. It expresses perfectly the quality in writing I most relish. The New Yorker brims with it.

I notice that this year’s “Mid-Year Top Ten” contains a “Goings On About Town” list. That’s a new feature, isn’t it?

Yes, it is. Over the last couple of years, “Goings On About Town” has become my favorite section of the magazine.

Why is that?

I think it has to do with my preference for description over narrative. “Goings On About Town” contains an abundance of great description.

Give me an example.

Well, the one that immediately comes to mind is Becky Cooper’s brilliant “Tables For Two” piece on Mermaid Spa, in which, in detail after sensuous detail, she describes the dining room, the sauna, the steam room, and the food. For me, it’s one of the most memorable pieces of the year so far – right up there with Luke Mogelson’s “The Avengers of Mosul” and John Kinsella’s “Milking the Tiger Snake.”

Your lists are always positive. Have you ever considered including a “worst” or “most disappointing” category?

No. My list is a fan’s list. I like to keep it positive.

Is your list in anyway biased?

Yes, I readily admit I have favorites – Ian Frazier, James Wood, and Peter Schjeldahl, to name three. I relish Robert Sullivan’s writing. Anytime he appears in the magazine, I try to get him on my list.

Who do you think reads these lists? Who’s your target audience?

I’m not sure who reads them. I don’t have a target. I make them for their own sake. They’re my way of paying homage to The New Yorker – to the many writers, editors, and artists who produce it. Also, these lists afford me the pleasure of revisiting the magazine pieces and savoring my favorite passages.

Do you foresee a time when your enthusiasm for The New Yorker will wane and you’ll stop making these lists?

No. I’m totally hooked on The New Yorker. If anything, my addiction is intensifying.

Saturday, March 18, 2017

John Kinsella's Great "Milking the Tiger Snake"


John Kinsella (Photo by Michael Wilson)













John Kinsella’s brilliant “Milking the Tiger Snake” (The New Yorker, January 9, 2017) evokes a transfixing image – a bushman extracting venom from a deadly snake:

Fangs through a balloon, an orange balloon
stretched over a jam-jar mouth scrubbed-up
bush standard—fangs dripping what looks
like semen, which is venom, one of the most
deadly, down grooves and splish splash
onto the lens of the distorting glass-bottom
boat we look up into, head of tiger
snake pressed flat with the bushman’s
thumb—his scungy hat that did Vietnam,
a bandolier across his matted chest
chocked with cartridges—pistoleer
who takes out ferals with secretive
patriotic agendas. And we kids watch
him draw the head of the fierce snake,
its black body striped yellow. “It will rear
up like a cobra if cornered, and attack,
attack!” he stresses as another couple
of droplets form and plummet. And when
we say, “Mum joked leave them alone
and they’ll go home,” he retorts, “Typical
bloody woman, first to moan if she’s bit,
first to want a taste of the anti-venom
that comes of my rooting these black
bastards out, milking them dry, down
to the last drop.” Tiger snake’s eyes
peer out crazily targeting the neck
of the old coot with his dirty mouth,
its nicotine garland. He from whom
we learn, who shows us porno
and tells us what’s what. Or tiger snake
out of the wetlands, whip-cracked
by the whip of itself until its back is broke.

“Milking the Tiger Snake” is absolutely alive. What makes it so? How does Kinsella achieve his effects? One way is his use of zero articles – not “the fangs,” but “fangs”; not “the head of a tiger snake,” but “head of tiger snake”; not “the tiger snake’s eyes,” but “tiger snake’s eyes”; not “the tiger snake out of the wetlands,” but “tiger snake out of the wetlands.” Cutting the articles intensifies the image.

Another Kinsella move is his use of the present tense (“look,” “watch,” “stress,” “say,” “retorts,” “peer,” “learn,” “shows,” “tells”). Use of the present tense makes the image more immediate, direct, and impactful.

A third Kinsella technique is his use of words I can see (“fangs through a balloon, an orange balloon,” “stretched over a jam-jar mouth,” “fangs dripping what looks / like semen, which is venom,” “down grooves and splish splash / onto the lens of the distorting glass-bottom / boat,” “head of tiger / snake pressed flat with the bushman’s / thumb,” “scungy hat that did Vietnam,” “a bandolier across his matted chest / chocked with cartridges,” “the fierce snake, / its black body striped yellow,” “droplets form and plummet,” “the old coot with his dirty mouth, / its nicotine garland,” “tiger snake / out of the wetlands, whip-cracked / by the whip of itself until its back is broke”). These words jump to life as I read them.

Two more aspects of “Milking the Tiger Snake” that contribute to its vitality: (1) The rhythmic way it moves down the page, its six sentences acoustically arranged in thirty-two lines; (2) Its spontaneity; it has the feel of actual encounter, naked experience, quickly sketched as it’s happening, or immediately afterwards, while the details are still vivid. 

“Milking the Tiger Snake” is a great poem – where greatness means original, evocative, vigorous, specific, and striking. I enjoyed it immensely.

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

January 16, 2012 Issue

“No ideas but in things,” William Carlos Williams said. Patricia Marx intently follows the dictum, but the “things” she writes about (e.g., “a Moschino ‘Great Hits Spring/Summer 2007’ evening bag that looks like two 45-r.p.m. records stitched together with yarn,” “leather spats trimmed with polka-dot grosgrain ribbon,” “an I. Magnin black velvet hat with a marine-blue feather, circa 1945,” “a bristle brush shaped like a cross,” “Urban Decay eyeshadow,” “Murray’s lemony-garlic rotisserie chicken,” “a scoop-necked wool bouclé jacket trimmed with turquoise-like stones,” “sunglasses with taxicab yellow visors over the lenses,” “a flock of ghoulish Tweety Birds with x’d out eyes,” "chunky Marni necklaces made from colorful shapes of melted and stretched bovine horn”) make Williams’s “things” (e.g., wheelbarrow, rainwater) seem pretty tame. This week, in a piece titled “A Bushel and a Peck,” Marx describes, in detail after marvelous detail, the wondrous items she finds at Fairway, Whole Foods, Zabar’s, and other food megastores. Marx’s writing constantly enables us to see and feel the texture of things. Here, for example, is her description of some of the “quality grub” available at Eli’s:

At Eli’s the produce glistens: champagne grapes $4, seasonal), exquisite endive $5.99/lb.). (“My friend can always taste if my endive is from there. She’ll say, ‘Did you get this from the burglars? It’s sooo good.’”) The cheeses are evidently so valuable that some like the drunken goat cheese soaked in wine ($20/lb.) and the Tête de Moine, a Swiss cheese eaten by scraping it with a knife ($20/lb.), must be kept under surveillance in vitrines.

I’m not sure who’s being quoted in the parenthesis, but the sensuous “It’s sooo good” could stand as a tagline for the whole piece. And that detail about how Tête de Moine is eaten (“by scraping it with a knife”) is delectable.

A hallmark of Marx’s style is her habit of asking lots of questions, many of which are amazing – so loaded with specificity, so layered with detail, that they’re almost surreal. Her “A Bushel and a Peck" contains a beauty that went straight into my “Patricia Marx Great Questions” collection:

Oh, the bagels, the thirty-seven varieties of olive (in oil), the fat wedges of Parmigiano Reggiano, organic popcorn, French milled soap that lasts forever, frozen Barney’s Franks ’n Blankets, locally made Ben’s cream cheese, and how about Murray’s lemony-garlic rotisserie chicken (you could eat it till you die), plus six hundred artisanal cheeses from around the world, and, would you believe it, Velveeta and Spam, too?

This is classic Patricia Marx. She’s not really eliciting information; she’s expressing astonishment that Fairway carries all these exotic items and, in addition, has Velveeta and Spam.

When Marx starts a question with “Oh,” as she does in the above quote, look out - a wondrous string of words is about to unfurl. She did it a few years ago in her brilliant “On And Off The Avenue: Marni” (The New Yorker, January 5, 2009):

Oh, and could I also have that strand of fabric-covered beads anchoring a large plastron of midnight-blue resin? And the pendant that looks like a conference pass except that, instead of a name tag inside the clear plastic pouch, there’s a grid of acrylic gems?

These are questions, but they’re also akin to the inventory of the contents of a Joseph Cornell box.

Here are six more examples of Marx’s delightful questions, gathered from various New Yorker pieces she’s written over the last few years:

Are you certain that you have what it takes to shop discount? Do you have the patience to excavate heaps of finery that is frayed, smudged, stretched, faded, pulled, ripped, mis-sized, unstylish, out of season, or never was in season? The grit to see yourself in the glare of fluorescent lighting – if you can even find a mirror? The confidence to have an opinion without being told what it is by an encouraging salesperson? Do you thrill to the ambience of the Department of Motor Vehicles? (“The Price Is Right,” December 8, 2008)

Is the sign in the rest room that warns “No napping” directed at the employees? Or is it for the toddlers who shop here, knowing that Daffy’s is tops for European children’s attire? Wouldn’t that cunning white knit jacket with subtle embroidery be just the thing for a little one to spit up on ($59, reduced from $200)? (“The Price Is Right,” December 8, 2008)

Do you know what several dozen bottles breaking in the back seat sounds like? (“To Shop and Drive in L.A,” March 20, 2006)

Really, now, should a piece of plastic and a couple of breakable hinges cost more than the laptop I’m typing on? (“Four Eyes,” March 29, 2010)

Are toys passé? Would a child give the time of day to a model-train set or to finger paints when, not far from the playroom, the sirens of Penguin Whacker on the iPhone, and Fruit Ninja on the iPad, beckon? (“Toy Stories,” December 6, 2010)

Did you know that Minnesota enacted a law last year requiring all American flags sold there to originate in the land of the free and the home of the sewing machine? (“Made In U.S.A.,” March 16, 2009)

Marx is a terrific writer – where “terrific” means specific, artful, avid, humorous, sensual, quasi-surreal. I enjoy her work immensely.

Postscript: Another pleasure in this week’s issue is John Kinsella’s poem “The Fable of the Great Sow.” I like its kinetic pig energy (“A leap across the gate, a pivot on the wall / Opposite, and over into a neighboring pen”), its pig descriptions (“She was total pig,/Pure sow who’d farrowed litter on litter/To watch them raised to slaughter”), its pig reality (“flies and heat of the shed”). Kinsella is becoming one of my favorite poets. His “Goat” (The New Yorker, May 3, 2010) is brilliant.