I enjoyed all three of these reviews immensely. I'm particularly struck by Robson’s idea that Loving is at least partially sourced in Renoir's The Rules of the Game. For this reason, his “Doings and Undoings” is this week’s Pick of the Issue.
Wednesday, October 26, 2016
October 17, 2016, Issue
Pick of the Issue this week is a tussle between three sparkling reviews: Leo Robson’s “Doings and Undoings”; Dan Chiasson’s “Hell of a Drug”;
and Peter Schjeldahl’s “Drawing Lines.”
In “Doings and Undoings,” Robson brilliantly assesses Henry
Green’s oeuvre, describing his style as “terse, intimate, full of accident and
unnerving comedy, exquisite though still exuberant, sensual and whimsical,
reflexively figurative yet always surprising, preoccupied with social nuance,
generational discord, and sensory phenomena while maintaining an air of
abstraction, as reflected in those flighty gerund titles.” The piece contains
two bravura analytical moves: (1) a comparison of Green’s Loving with Jean Renoir’s The
Rules of the Game (“Green was an obsessive cinemagoer, and Loving, in its plot and setting, has
strong resemblances to Jean Renoir’s The
Rules of the Game (1939), which concerns upstairs-downstairs antics at a
French villa over a shooting weekend”); (2) a tracing of Green’s originality
back to his youth when his family home was turned into a hospital for
convalescent officers:
Green wrote that he “began to learn the half-tones of
class,” and then prevaricates: “or, if not to learn because I was too young, to
see enough to recognize the echoes later when I came to hear them.” And he
learned something even more valuable: how to listen, to surrender, to make
himself a vehicle or channel. The soldiers, he recalled, “found in me a boy who
looked on them as heroes every one and who enjoyed each story of blood and
cruelty they had to tell.”
My favorite sentence in “Doings and Undoings” is Robson’s
description of Green’s Caught:
During the early years of the Second World War—the so-called
Phoney or Bore War, then the Big Blitz—while his wife, Dig, and son, Sebastian,
were living in the countryside, Green remained in London, responding to air
raids, frequenting jazz clubs, falling serially in love, socializing with other
firemen—and writing one of his best novels, the charged, ornate, and wrenching Caught (1943), which amounted to a
virtual live feed of all that activity.
That “which amounted to a virtual live feed of all that
activity” is superb!
Dan Chiasson, in his excellent “Hell of a Drug,” reviews
Frances Wilson’s Guilty Thing: A Life of
Thomas De Quincey. He writes,
Wilson’s book is on a collision course with her subject.
This is always the case with biographies of great autobiographers. Somehow one
needs to figure out how to do more than tidy up after the subject’s mind has
swept, cyclone-like, through the details of his life.
My favorite sentence in “Hell of a Drug” is “The details of
his life were like carrousel horses, disappearing around the bend and
reappearing, in his visions as in his writing, with fresh intensity and
vividness.”
In “Drawing Lines,” Peter Schjeldahl reviews the Guggenheim
Museum’s new Agnes Martin retrospective. Schjeldahl has written at least one
previous piece on Martin’s work – his great “Life Work” (The New Yorker, June 7, 2004), in which
he memorably describes Martin’s 2003 masterpiece The Sea: “Scored, alternately continuous and broken horizontal
lines cut to white gessoed canvas through a white-bordered square mass of
tar-black paint.” God, I love that! Can
Schjeldahl top it? I wondered, as I began reading his new piece. It turns
out he comes mighty close with this beauty:
The show starts with a late climax: “The Islands I-XII”
(1979), a dozen paintings in acrylic that at first glance appear almost
identically all-white but which deploy differently proportioned horizontal
bands and pencilled lines. Admixtures of light, almost subliminal blue cool
some of the bands. The design stops just short of the sides of the canvas. When
you notice this, the fields of paint seem to jiggle loose, and to hover. If you
look long enough—the minute or so that Martin deemed sufficient for her
works—your sensation-starved optic nerve may produce fugitive impressions of
other colors. (At one point, I saw green, and then I didn’t.) It helps to shade
your eyes. This causes tones to darken and textures to register more strongly.
Looking at Martin’s art is something of an art in itself. Motivated by
continual, ineffable rewards, you become an adept.
"Admixtures of light, almost subliminal blue cool some
of the bands" – how fine that is.
I enjoyed all three of these reviews immensely. I'm particularly struck by Robson’s idea that Loving is at least partially sourced in Renoir's The Rules of the Game. For this reason, his “Doings and Undoings” is this week’s Pick of the Issue.
Labels:
Dan Chiasson,
Leo Robson,
Peter Schjeldahl,
The New Yorker
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment