I like the look of Pawel Pawlikowski’s Ida, and the feel of it. Pawlikowski has a poet’s gift for using objects, landscapes, and people expressively, so that they all become part of his vision. It’s this gift, I think, that makes Ida a rich, emotionally charged experience.
Wednesday, August 6, 2014
Minimal Realism in Pawel Pawlikowski's "Ida"
I like the look of Pawel Pawlikowski’s Ida, and the feel of it. Pawlikowski has a poet’s gift for using objects, landscapes, and people expressively, so that they all become part of his vision. It’s this gift, I think, that makes Ida a rich, emotionally charged experience.
The
best description of Pawlikowski’s technique that I’ve read is found in David
Denby’s " 'Ida': A Film Masterpiece"
(“Culture Desk,” newyorker.com, May 27, 2014):
The
director and his fledgling cinematographer, Lukasz Zal, shot the movie in
hard-focus black and white; they have produced images so distinct and powerful
that they sharpen our senses. “Ida” might be called static were it not for the
currents of emotion from shot to shot, which electrify the women’s relation to
each other throughout. Clearing away clutter, Pawlikowski almost never moves
the camera; many of the scenes are just long-lasting shots, fed by a single
light source that often puts the faces in partial shadow (what we understand of
these two women will always be limited). Sometimes the figures are positioned
at the bottom of the frame, with enormous gray Polish skies above them, as if
the entire burden of a cursed country weighed on its people. Both beautiful and
oppressive, the bleakness of the landscape in winter suggests something uncanny
in the air, as if we were watching a horror film without ghouls.
One
can trace possible influences—Carl Theodor Dreyer, very likely, and Robert
Bresson, and European art films from the sixties and early seventies like
François Truffaut’s “The Wild Child,” and also Polish movies made in the period
in which “Ida” is set. But I can’t recall anything major that looks quite like
this movie. Pawlikowski is not after commonplace realism but something you
would have to call minimal realism, in which the paring away of cinematic junk
makes our attention to what remains almost rapt: the clinking of the nuns’
spoons at a silent convent dinner, some gentle country sounds, the transfixing
boredom of long drives through the flat landscape.
That “minimal realism, in which the paring away of cinematic
junk makes our attention almost rapt,” is an excellent description of Pawlikowski’s style. I prefer
it to, say, “stylistic austerity,” and variations thereof, which some critics
are using to describe Ida’s form.
See, for example, Dana Stevens,
"Ida" (Slate, May 2, 2014): “In many
ways, Ida feels like a film that might have been made anytime in the
past 50 years. It’s set in the early 1960s, and its stylistic austerity and
interest in theological questions often recall the work of Robert Bresson
(though Pawlikowski lacks—I think—Bresson’s deeply held faith in salvation).”
The comparison of Ida with Bresson’s work is, I think, a
mistake. Bresson’s films, particularly Diary
of a Country Priest (1950), are
austerely beautiful. But they’re also intolerably pious and inhumanly pure. In her capsule review
of Diary of a Country Priest, Pauline
Kael says of the young priest whose faith is neither understood nor accepted by
his parishioners, “Does Bresson know what a pain this young man is? The
priest’s austere spirituality may give the community the same sort of pain that
Bresson’s later movies give some of us in the audience” (5001 Nights at the Movies, 1991). Ida is brief; it is spare; it is shot in black-and-white; it is
dominated by the color gray (not because Pawlikowski wants to be austere, but
because he wants to be true to the times (“What was that lovely city beneath
Communism’s gray casing?” Adam Zagajewsky asks, in his memoir Another Beauty). But Ida also has jazz in it, and sex, and
vitality. There’s a young naïve, pious Catholic nun in it, but there’s also a
worldly, cynical, hard-drinking, nicotine-addicted aunt known as Red Wanda.
Ida is, as Anthony Lane says, in
his "Road Trips" (The New Yorker, May
12, 2014), “a road movie, of sorts” (“Thus to our surprise, this small
tale becomes a road movie, of sorts, and a journey back into a divisive past”).
That “of sorts” is crucial. Most road movies (e.g., Thelma & Louise, The
Motorcycle Diaries, Sideways) are
wild rides. Ida is more solemn (Denby
calls it a “spiritual journey”).
But it’s still a thousand times wilder than Bresson’s painstakingly tedious and
offensively holy Diary of a Country
Priest. In Ida, two women
– tough, wry Wanda and her young niece, Ida, a Catholic nun – set off by
car to discover how Ida’s parents died. Their vehicle, a small, white Polish
sedan (is it a Trabant? a Syrena? I’d love to know) has almost as much presence
as the Norton motorcycle (“the Mighty One”) in Motorcycle Diaries. At one point, we see an intoxicated Wanda
driving it, and in the next moment, we see it being hauled back onto the road
by a handsome team of workhorses. I leaned forward to absorb this remarkable scene, but it vanished in an instant – just one example of Ida’s many wonderful, understated
details.
Road movie landscapes are often ravishing (e.g., the
gold-and-green Santa Ynez Valley in Sideways,
the soaring Andean vistas in Motorcycle
Diaries); not so in Ida. Well,
let me qualify that. Ida’s landscape is ravishing if you relish, as I do, the
beauty of bleakness – “the moon-gray landscape of eastern Poland,” as Lane
describes it ("Ida," newyorker.com). This is a landscape soaked in
repressed memory, and Ida is an
opening to it, an excavation of horrific memory buried in the Polish ground.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Since you asked, it's a Wartburg, model 311 probably. Excellent review, btw.
ReplyDeleteVery interesting. Thank you. I think Red Wanda’s Wartburg is destined for classic movie car status – right up there with Scottie’s white 1956 Desoto in Hitchcock’s "Vertigo."
Delete