|
Illustration by Harry Campbell |
This is just a quick note to say how much I enjoyed
Lizzie Widdicombe’s "Happy Together" (The
New Yorker, May 16, 2016.) I failed to mention it in my post on the May 16
issue. Now, I’m feeling guilty. The piece reads like a streak. Widdicombe makes
writing seem so effortless, even though I know it isn’t – for her or anyone
else. For example, take “Happy Together” ’s second paragraph:
First stop: Craigslist, for a place to live. Kennedy was
unfamiliar with the city’s neighborhoods, but he’d seen HBO’s “Girls,” and, he
said, “I pretty much knew I was going to be in Brooklyn.” He checked out
one-bedroom apartments in Williamsburg, where the average monthly rent is
around three thousand dollars. Nope. He eventually landed in Bedford-Stuyvesant,
where a guy named Patrick was subletting a room in his two-bedroom apartment
for a thousand and fifty dollars a month.
That “Nope” made me smile. Who owns it? It somehow belongs
to both Widdicombe and Kennedy. It’s the journalistic equivalent of fiction’s free
indirect speech.
Here’s an even better example: “But, he said, ‘I’d end up
going to a bar and just sitting there, talking to a bartender and staring at
Twitter.’ A thought surfaced: I’m surrounded by people and things to do, and
yet I’m so fucking bored and lonely.” That second sentence is Widdicombe bending
her words around Kennedy’s thought.
“Happy Together” has a brisk unostentatious naturalness that I
relish. Its blend of modern materials (apps, startups, social media) enacts the new mode of
living it describes. It seems to re-create, with extraordinary fidelity, the
texture of everyday life in the “sharing economy.” It stoked my appetite for
more Widdicombe.
No comments:
Post a Comment