Schjeldahl’s willingness to explore his “equivocal appetite” is one of the qualities that set him apart from other critics. Even though his passion is for Pollock, he’s happy to give Ryman’s austere works their due.
Saturday, December 26, 2015
December 21 & 28, 2015 Issue
The year began with Peter Schjeldahl (see his wonderful "Take Your Time," The New Yorker, January 5,
2015); it’s only fitting that it should end with him. He’s enjoyed a prolific
2015 – eighteen “Art World” pieces, all of them dandy, plus contributions to
“Goings On About Town” and newyorker.com. I devour all his work. In a magazine
loaded with stylish writers, his style is the most distinctive. This week, he
has two pieces in the magazine – "The Dripping Point" and "Shades of White." Both
are excellent, but in different ways.
“The Dripping Point,”
a “Goings On About Town” note on MoMA’s Jackson
Pollock: A Collective Survey, 1934-1954, shows Schjeldahl celebrating one
of his favorite artists. He says, “Pollock’s lifelong intensity and, at his
peak, sublimity do not pale.” I agree. Whatever turns Schjeldahl on, turns me
on, especially when it engenders delectable descriptions like this: “interwoven
high-speed skeins in black, white, dove-gray, teal, and fawn-brown oil and
enamel bang on the surface while hinting at cosmic distances.” That’s Pollock’s
great One: Number 31, 1950, as
rendered in Schjeldahl’s inimitable word paint. Reading “The Dripping Point,” I
experience double bliss: the subject is unimpeachably interesting; the writing
is intensely pleasurable.
The other Schjeldahl piece in this week’s issue – “Shades of
White” – is cooler. It’s a review of the Robert Ryman retrospective at Dia Art
Foundation. Schjeldahl uses words like “phlegmatic,” “philosophical,”
“monkish,” and “mute” to describe Ryman’s all-white abstracts. He says, “At
times, the main—or, really, only—event is an emphasis on the way a work is
attached to a wall: by bolts, staples, brackets, or flanges.” But Schjeldahl
isn’t dismissive. At one point, he says,
If I could have one work from the show, to satisfy my
somewhat equivocal appetite for Rymanism, it would be the delicately befuddling
“Arista” (1968), a six-foot-square painting on unstretched linen, which is
stapled to the wall and abutted, on the wall, by ruled lines in blue chalk. The
lines suggest a guide to placement, but there they are in place, themselves, as
the most interesting feature of the work. The particular meaning, if any, of a
Ryman commonly tiptoes just out of mental reach.
Schjeldahl’s willingness to explore his “equivocal appetite” is one of the qualities that set him apart from other critics. Even though his passion is for Pollock, he’s happy to give Ryman’s austere works their due.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment