Is Adam Begley’s Updike
worth reading? That was the question on my mind as I began reading Louis
Menand’s "Imitation of Life," a review of Begley’s book, in this week’s issue. The answer appears to be
yes. Menand says, “Writing was what the man was about, and the writing is what
Begley focuses on. Updike is a highly literate illumination of a supremely
literate human being.”
Updike was a “supremely literate human being” who disliked
literary biographies. Some of his severest criticism is found in his reviews of
biographies of Eliot, Fitzgerald, Cheever, Graham Greene, and Dorothy Parker,
among others. His view was that writers’ lives are “poured into books, not
deeds” (“This Side of Coherence,” More
Matter, 1999). He deplored biographies that dish “the dirt, the lowdown”
(“This Side of Coherence”).
The one exception he made is for biographies that enable us “to
partake again, from another angle, of the joys we have experienced within the
author’s oeuvre, in the presence of a voice and mind we have come to love” (“On
Literary Biography,” Due Considerations,
2007). The supreme example of this kind of biography is George D. Painter’s Marcel Proust (1959). Updike admired Painter’s book enormously. In “On Literary Biography,”
he wrote, “Lovers of Proust will be inevitably drawn to Painter because it is
more of the same, mirrored back into reality.”
Based on my reading of Menand’s “Imitation of Life,” I’d say
that Adam Begley’s Updike sounds like
it’s mostly in the Painter category. Menand says that Begley’s Updike “is essentially an extended essay
in biographical criticism, an insight into the man through the work and the
work through the man.”
I wish Menand had provided at least one extended quotation
from Begley’s Updike so that I could
form my own impression of Begley’s writing. But he says enough to persuade me
that Begley’s book is worth a look.
Postscript: Pick of the Issue this week is Justin Quinn’s delightful "Recession Song," celebrating the medicinal and spiritual benefits of sage (“Sage is just
the thing / for snakebite, bee sting / and keeping the bad at bay”). It’s a classic
poem, beautifully rhymed, artfully lineated, specific, vital, and complete. It
went straight into my personal anthology of great New Yorker poems.
No comments:
Post a Comment