Tuesday, November 12, 2013
November 11, 2013 Issue
A great critical piece stimulates thought in many
directions. Case in point is Dan Chiasson’s absorbing “All About My Mother” in
this week’s issue. It’s a review of Linda Leavell’s biography of Marianne
Moore, Holding On Upside Down. Reading it, I recalled Helen Vendler’s “On Marianne Moore” (The New Yorker, October 16, 1978; included in her wonderful 1980
collection Part of Nature, Part of Us),
which concludes with a memorable story about how Moore’s poem
“Nevertheless” arose:
Moore, seeing in a box of strawberries a misshapen green one,
almost all seeds, said, “Here’s a strawberry that’s had quite a struggle,” and
found thereby a first line.
Moore’s compassion for the misshapen green strawberry is
another marvelous instance of what Chiasson calls, in his piece, her “unlikely
applications of empathy.” He quotes the opening of her brilliant “The Fish”
(the title of which runs into the first line) – “wade / through black jade. / Of
the crow-blue mussel-shells, one / keeps / adjusting the ash-heaps; / Opening
and shutting itself like / an / injured fan” - and says:
These unlikely applications of empathy – to a mussel shell,
a fan, a fish condemned to wading through stone – all enter through the
unmarked portal of “description”; only later do we realize that what has been
described is not what Moore saw but what Moore felt on seeing what she saw.
This – along with Vendler’s observation that Moore is a
naturalist - strikes me as an excellent way of approaching and enjoying Moore’s
work. And you can also add the intriguing possibility that when Moore describes
something - strawberry, elephant, fish,
ostrich - she’s providing a self-portrait. Chiasson touches on this point when
he says,
Like the elephant, she could say, “I do these / things which
I do, which please / no one but myself,” and boast the poet’s boast: “My ears
are sensitized to more than the sound of / the wind.” What she said of the
“rust-backed mongoose,” she could have said of herself: “Its restlessness was /
its excellence”: “it was praised for its wit; / and the jerboa, like it, / a
small desert rat, / and not famous, that / lives without water, has /
happiness.”
There’s a delightful reference in Chiasson’s piece to
Elizabeth Bishop’s “Efforts of Affection.” He rightly calls it a “great memoir.” It brings Moore to breathing life. Here’s
Bishop’s description of Moore’s eyes:
Her eyes were bright, not “bright” as we often say about
eyes when we really mean alert; they were that too, but also shiny bright and,
like those of a small animal, often looked at one sidewise – quickly, at the
conclusion of a sentence that had turned out unusually well.
Here is her laugh:
She had a way of laughing at what she or someone else had
just said if she meant to show outrage or mock disapproval – an oh-ho kind of
sound, rough, that went with a backwards and sidewise toss of the head toward
the left shoulder.
And here, unforgettably, is Bishop’s exquisite definition of
Moore’s governing aesthetic:
Marianne was intensely interested in the techniques of
things – how camellias are grown; how the quartz prisms work in crystal clocks;
how the pangolin can close up his ear, nose, and eye apertures and walk on the
outside edges of his hands “and save the claws / for digging”; how to drive a
car; how the best pitchers throw a baseball; how to make a figurehead for her
nephew’s sailboat. The exact way in which anything was done, or made, or
functioned, was poetry to her.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment