Introduction

What is The New Yorker? I know it’s a great magazine and that it’s a tremendous source of pleasure in my life. But what exactly is it? This blog’s premise is that The New Yorker is a work of art, as worthy of comment and analysis as, say, Keats’s “Ode on a Grecian Urn.” Each week I review one or more aspects of the magazine’s latest issue. I suppose it’s possible to describe and analyze an entire issue, but I prefer to keep my reviews brief, and so I usually focus on just one or two pieces, to explore in each the signature style of its author. A piece by Nick Paumgarten is not like a piece by Jill Lepore, and neither is like a piece by Ian Frazier. One could not mistake Collins for Seabrook, or Bilger for Goldfield, or Mogelson for Kolbert. Each has found a style, and it is that style that I respond to as I read, and want to understand and describe.

Wednesday, March 22, 2023

March 6, 2023 Issue

Merve Emre, in her absorbing “Marvellous Things,” in this week’s issue, extols the work of Italo Calvino. She calls him “the most charming writer to put pen to paper in the twentieth century.” That may be so. I’ve tried reading him, but never got very far. He’s too dreamy, too schematic for my taste. He’s a fabulist; I’m a realist. But there’s no doubt he could write. In his first novel, The Path to the Nest of Spiders (1947), he provides this description:

The old towns on the Ligurian coast grew up in times when those parts were infested by Moorish pirates; built to resist siege, they are as close and dense as pine-cones; their deep narrow alleys, called carrugi, are spanned by arches propping the tops of the houses, with dark vaulted arcades and flights of cobbled steps running far below …

That “they are as close and dense as pine-cones” is inspired! 

Emre’s comments on Calvino’s Mr. Palomar (1985) are compelling. She says of the book’s concluding vignette:

In the final vignette, “Learning to be dead,” Mr. Palomar tries to imagine the most obscure thing: the world after his death:

“If time has to end, it can be described, instant by instant,” Mr. Palomar thinks, “and each instant, when described, expands so that its end can no longer be seen.” He decides that he will set himself to describing every instant of his life, and until he has described them all he will no longer think of being dead. At that moment he dies.

It is a terribly funny and terribly bleak ending. Yet even here one finds a flicker of hope. If each of the twenty-seven vignettes is an instant in his life, and if each instant, when described, expands forever, then at the moment Mr. Palomar dies he lives. And if he lives forever we need never reconcile ourselves to a world without him in it.

Emre calls Mr. Palomar “Calvino’s most affecting work.” Her review spurs me to give him another try. 

No comments:

Post a Comment