Monday, July 16, 2012
Vertigo's "Happy Ending"
Does Alfred Hitchcock’s Vertigo end
happily? Richard Brody thinks so. He says that Vertigo’s “happy ending, of
health restored and crime punished, resembles an aridly monastic renunciation”
(“Vertigo,” "Goings On About Town," The New Yorker, May 28, 2012). New York Magazine thinks
otherwise. It says, “New Yorker film writer Richard Brody boldly but
delusionally states that Hitchcock’s Vertigo has a happy ending” (“The Approval Matrix: Week of June 11, 2012,” New
York Magazine, June 3, 2012). In “‘Vertigo’: The
Search For A Cure” (“The Front Row,” newyorker.com, June 7, 2012), Brody
replies that he was using “happy ending” ironically (“So, please allow me my
irony of suggesting that the movie has a truly happy ending: the revelation of
unhappy truth”). Why irony? Is Brody now saying he meant the opposite of what
he said? Recall Samuel Johnson’s definition of irony: “A mode of speech of
which the meaning is contrary to the words” (quoted in D. J. Enright’s The
Alluring Problem, 1986). Vertigo’s dark last scene shows Scottie (James Stewart)
standing on the ledge at the top of the Mission San Juan Bautista bell tower
where, only moments before, he witnessed his beloved Judy (Kim Novak) plunge to
her death. He’s conquered his acrophobia, but he’s lost (for the second time!)
the woman he loves. Standing on the precipice, looking down, Scottie is caught
in a sad equilibrium. It could be a scene in an Edward Hopper – a vision of a chill,
ominous world, noir to its bare bones.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment