Introduction

What is The New Yorker? I know it’s a great magazine and that it’s a tremendous source of pleasure in my life. But what exactly is it? This blog’s premise is that The New Yorker is a work of art, as worthy of comment and analysis as, say, Keats’s “Ode on a Grecian Urn.” Each week I review one or more aspects of the magazine’s latest issue. I suppose it’s possible to describe and analyze an entire issue, but I prefer to keep my reviews brief, and so I usually focus on just one or two pieces, to explore in each the signature style of its author. A piece by Nick Paumgarten is not like a piece by Jill Lepore, and neither is like a piece by Ian Frazier. One could not mistake Collins for Seabrook, or Bilger for Goldfield, or Mogelson for Kolbert. Each has found a style, and it is that style that I respond to as I read, and want to understand and describe.

Monday, July 10, 2023

Favorite Photo Reviews 9: Robert Hass's "Robert Adams and Los Angeles"

Robert Adams, Redlands Looking Toward Los Angeles (1978)











This is the second post in my “Favorite Photo Reviews” series. Today’s pick is Robert Hass’s wonderful “Robert Adams and Los Angeles” (included in his superb 2012 essay collection What Light Can Do).

It’s a review of a collection of Robert Adams’ pictures of the Los Angeles Basin, 1978-1983. I savor this piece for its classic tw0-step approach to critical writing: (1) describe; (2) analyze. Hass writes,

Consider “Redlands Looking Toward Los Angeles.” We are looking upward at a fan palm with a cropped top, somewhat asymmetrical - it seems to have more branches on the right side than the left. Near it - nearer, one would think, than makes sense - a slender pine with odd sprigs of bunched needles sprouting directly from the trunk, perhaps through some genetic peculiarity. Next to it and behind it - the distances are hard to judge - a profoundly asymmetrical and leafless tree of indistinct species, dead, or perhaps it’s winter. To the right of the picture a bushy, leaved tree much smaller or farther away, making a kind of lyric messiness as it spindles five or six trunks or trunkless toward the light. The light itself has caught in the edge of the of the palm’s trunk in a way that seems almost tender. Beyond and below this strange botanical collection, in the left half of the picture, there is a carved-up valley, a freeway perhaps and a dry aqueduct, next to which are a few more trees, possibly cottonwoods or Fremont willows, which suggest that the aqueduct and freeway had once been a riverbed that encouraged these natural configurations. On the embankment above the ribbon of freeway, what is possibly a train - it looks like a long dark caterpillar - and beyond that, little serpentine curves of white roads probably, though it looks like the glint of light on water. For the far background, two or three ridges of bare hills, and that L.A. sky, almost entirely effaced by something in the atmosphere, smoke or smog, which seems also to give everything else in the picture, except perhaps the edges of the palm, a hazy, softened, slightly out-of-focus look.

That’s one of the best descriptions of a photo I’ve ever read. And Hass isn’t done. He follows it with this brilliant analysis:

What emotion does it evoke, and what thoughts? The palm tree stands for Southern California; so do the freeways and the aqueduct. The first thing we notice, looking at it, is where we are. For me the second was some mix in the composition between the stark darkness of the tree silhouettes and the gentle and hazy light. Then, looking more closely, the slightly grotesque aspect of the trees. And the sense of space, and the dissolving distances. By then we have absorbed the fact that this image is in a wild, odd way very beautiful. And then, as if it were an almost comic afterthought, we might notice how much our responses depend on the way in which what we are looking at is an almost classical composition. Foreground and distance, a rivery space winding through the middle. It could be John Constable or, for that matter, Ansel Adams. The question that came to me was whether or not the composition was ironic. It doesn’t feel ironic, but it has a way of evoking an ideal of beauty that holds us responsible for what we are seeing. 

Near the end of this superb piece, Hass says of Adams’ work, it shows us “image after image of things we have seen but not noticed, or noticed and not seen, or don’t remember having seen or noticed, while recognizing that we’ve been seeing them all our lives.” This is well put. It reminds me of D. H. Lawrence’s definition of poetry: “an effort of attention.” Great photography shows us things we have seen but not noticed. It’s an effort of attention. 

No comments:

Post a Comment