Malcolm’s “East and West” imprinted Ben Maddow’s name in my memory. The passage in “The Storyteller,” beginning with the words “Does the name Ben Maddow mean anything to you?,” made me smile. Here is Malcolm, forty-three years after “East and West,” writing about Maddow again. Nothing in those intervening decades has changed her opinion of his book. She calls it “brilliant.”
Sunday, October 15, 2017
October 9, 2017 Issue
Janet Malcolm’s “The Storyteller,” a profile of MSNBC’s
Rachel Maddow, in this week’s issue, contains a delightful surprise. In the
penultimate section, a vivid character from one of her earliest New Yorker pieces suddenly reappears. Here
are the words that usher him in:
“Does the name Ben Maddow mean anything to you?” Maddow
asked during one of our early interviews. “Yes, it does,” I said. In the early
eighties, I had read a brilliant book—an illustrated biography of the
photographer Edward Weston—by a man of that name.
The book is Edward
Weston: Fifty Years. Malcolm not only read it; she favorably reviewed it in
a piece titled “Two Photographers” (The New Yorker, November 18, 1974;
re-titled “East and West” in her superb 1980 collection, Diana & Nikon),
praising it for, among other things, its “enormous, almost novelistic,
interest,” and concluding that it will “outlast many of Weston’s photographs.”
This is high praise, indeed, from a critic known for her
disdain for biography: see, for example, her great The Silent Woman (1994) (“Biography is the medium through which the
remaining secrets of the famous dead are taken from them and dumped out in full
view of the world”). Maddow’s Edward
Weston: Fifty Years is one of the few biographies she’s admired. (Another is Quentin Bell’s Virginia
Woolf: see “A House of One’s Own,” The
New Yorker, June 5, 1995.)
Malcolm’s “East and West” imprinted Ben Maddow’s name in my memory. The passage in “The Storyteller,” beginning with the words “Does the name Ben Maddow mean anything to you?,” made me smile. Here is Malcolm, forty-three years after “East and West,” writing about Maddow again. Nothing in those intervening decades has changed her opinion of his book. She calls it “brilliant.”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment