Second Thoughts: The above post is unsatisfactory. It quotes from James Wood’s “Total Recall,” but it omits something important. It fails to say that “Total Recall” is one of the most stimulating reviews I’ve read this year. I devoured it. The passage that begins, “He notices everything – too much, no doubt – but often lingers beautifully,” is superb. And the ending (“Mourning, for Knausgaard, involves an acceptance that we are all things, even the people we have known and loved and hated will slowly leak away their meaning. Death and life finally unite, married in their ordinariness”) is inspired. Wood’s writing is one of this blog’s lodestars. If I sometimes quote it negatively, as I do above, I do so with the greatest respect.
Thursday, August 23, 2012
August 13 & 20, 2012 Issue
James Wood is a sucker for flatness – flat prose, flat
characters. In his admiring review of Teju Cole’s Open City, he says, “Cole prepares his effects so patiently
and cumulatively, over many pages of relatively ‘flat’ description” (“The
Arrival of Enigmas,” The New Yorker,
February 28, 2011). In How Fiction Works (2008), he says of certain “flat” characters (e.g., Michael Henchard
in The Mayor of Casterbridge,
Gould in Nostromo), “Yet they are
no less vivid, interesting or true as creations, for being flat.” And in the
current issue of The New Yorker,
reviewing Karl Ove Knausgaard’s My Struggle, he quotes a seemingly prosaic passage detailing
detergent brands and says, “Yet Knausgaard pauses to think aloud at this
moment, and wrings a distinctively flat, rigorous poetry out of the Klorin and
the Ajax.”
Wood can have his flatness. I’m not a fan of it. Flat prose
is like flat beer – it’s dead. I seek vitality – “the strangeness of the
vital,” as John Updike expressed it in the concluding sentence of his great “An
Introduction to Three Novels by Henry Green,” Hugging the Shore, 1983). There’s an excellent example of “the strangeness
of the vital” in this week’s issue of the magazine. I’m referring to Ben
McGrath’s sparkling “Medals and Marketing,” a vitally swift, fluid, humorous,
colorful account of life at the London Olympics with particular emphasis on the
Games’ commercialization. Here’s one of my favorite passages:
Good luck to anyone who brought a MasterCard or a Discover
card with him to the Olympic Park, in Stratford, hoping to stock up on T-shirts
featuring Wenlock, the one-eyed mascot. Visa only, please – and that goes for
the A.T.M.s, too. So great was Visa’s investment in Phelps going into London
that a couple of months ago the company’s head of global sponsorship marketing,
Ricardo Fort, personally ironed a pink shirt for him in a midtown Manhattan
hotel basement while Phelps conducted phone interviews to promote Visa’s Go
World campaign, pausing occasionally to reload on calories with yogurt and
granola.
What a surprising, delightful mix of facts and images! Look
at the variety of ingredients – Olympic Park, credit cards, T-shirts, one-eyed
mascot, A.T.Ms, Phelps, iron, pink shirt, Manhattan hotel basement, phone
interviews, yogurt, and granola. This is an original word combo; it’s typical
of almost every passage in the piece.
Here’s another example:
Doubles canoeing presented a real dilemma: do you go flat
water, and catch the Belarussian Bahdanovich brothers, or white water, and see
the Slovakian Hochschorner twins? In the end, I took Mayor Boris Johnson’s
advice, and went to Horse Guards parade, near Buckingham Palace, in search of
‘wet otters’ – Johnson’s euphemism, in an op-ed for the Daily Telegraph, for the women of beach volleyball.
The piece is endlessly quotable. McGrath’s collection and
arrangement of variegated materials – dialogue, quotation, tweets, songs,
descriptions (“Her pirouette to the left looked slow and mannered, and her
pirouette to the right began with a bit of a lurch and an over-large first
step”), names, characters, terms, and aphorisms (“The Olympics are nothing if
not a convention of salesmen”) – is amazing. Like the event it describes, “Medals
and Marketing” is full of zing, juice and luster. I enjoyed it immensely.
Second Thoughts: The above post is unsatisfactory. It quotes from James Wood’s “Total Recall,” but it omits something important. It fails to say that “Total Recall” is one of the most stimulating reviews I’ve read this year. I devoured it. The passage that begins, “He notices everything – too much, no doubt – but often lingers beautifully,” is superb. And the ending (“Mourning, for Knausgaard, involves an acceptance that we are all things, even the people we have known and loved and hated will slowly leak away their meaning. Death and life finally unite, married in their ordinariness”) is inspired. Wood’s writing is one of this blog’s lodestars. If I sometimes quote it negatively, as I do above, I do so with the greatest respect.
Second Thoughts: The above post is unsatisfactory. It quotes from James Wood’s “Total Recall,” but it omits something important. It fails to say that “Total Recall” is one of the most stimulating reviews I’ve read this year. I devoured it. The passage that begins, “He notices everything – too much, no doubt – but often lingers beautifully,” is superb. And the ending (“Mourning, for Knausgaard, involves an acceptance that we are all things, even the people we have known and loved and hated will slowly leak away their meaning. Death and life finally unite, married in their ordinariness”) is inspired. Wood’s writing is one of this blog’s lodestars. If I sometimes quote it negatively, as I do above, I do so with the greatest respect.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment