Introduction

What is The New Yorker? I know it’s a great magazine and that it’s a tremendous source of pleasure in my life. But what exactly is it? This blog’s premise is that The New Yorker is a work of art, as worthy of comment and analysis as, say, Keats’s “Ode on a Grecian Urn.” Each week I review one or more aspects of the magazine’s latest issue. I suppose it’s possible to describe and analyze an entire issue, but I prefer to keep my reviews brief, and so I usually focus on just one or two pieces, to explore in each the signature style of its author. A piece by Nick Paumgarten is not like a piece by Jill Lepore, and neither is like a piece by Ian Frazier. One could not mistake Collins for Seabrook, or Bilger for Goldfield, or Mogelson for Kolbert. Each has found a style, and it is that style that I respond to as I read, and want to understand and describe.

Saturday, September 26, 2020

September 14, 2020 Issue

James Wood, in his How Fiction Works (2008), says, “Is specificity in itself satisfying? I think it is.” I think it is, too. I think it’s one of the key elements of effective writing. In this week’s New Yorker, Wood elaborates his theory of specificity, focusing on its opposite – cliché. He says,

Cliché is our original sin, the thing we all try to escape, but the offense is not merely aesthetic or musical; it is epistemological—cliché blocks our apprehension of reality. In place of singularity, it substitutes commonality; in place of the private oddity, it offers the shared obviousness. [“Reward System”]

That “cliché blocks our apprehension of reality” is inspired. How do you avoid cliché? Seek specificity.

No comments:

Post a Comment