|
Peter Schjeldahl (Photo by Alex Remnick) |
Peter Schjeldahl is irreplaceable. Nevertheless, The New Yorker needs to have an art critic. Who are some of the possibilities? I see Hilton Als had an “Art World” piece in last week’s issue. But I'm not sure he’s the right guy for the job. He's too caught up in identity politics. I’d like to see someone in the position whose values are governed more by pleasure than anything else. And I’d like to see someone who writes with an unmistakable, idiosyncratic, formally coherent personal style. Here are some candidates I’d consider if I were picking the magazine’s new art critic: 1. David Salle
2. Wayne Koestenbaum
3. Gini Alhadeff
4. Susan Tallman
5. Johanna Fateman
The best living art writer is T. J. Clark. But his thinking might be a shade too metaphysical for the New Yorker job. The perfect choice is Salle: see his brilliant series of art pieces for The New York Review of Books.
John, do you like Jerry Saltz's reviews and essays?
ReplyDeleteI'm embarrassed to say I've never read him. Maybe I should start?
DeleteI’ve just spent an hour exploring New York magazine’s archive of Jerry Saltz writing. What a revelation! I feel sheepish that I didn’t know about him. He was not on my radar. But he is now. Thank you for bringing him to my attention. I see he has a new book out, a collection of his essays and reviews called “Art Is Life.” I’m going to order it.
DeleteI really like Simon Schama's writing. There's not enough of it in the New Yorker, so a regular beat as an art critic would be great.
ReplyDeleteFunny you should say that. I was thinking of adding Schama to my list of candidates. He was the magazine's art critic back in the mid-1990s: see, for example, "True Grid" (on Piet Mondrian); "California Dreaming" (on David Hockney); and "Dangerous Curves" (on Ellsworth Kelly) - all brilliant!
Delete