Introduction

What is The New Yorker? I know it’s a great magazine and that it’s a tremendous source of pleasure in my life. But what exactly is it? This blog’s premise is that The New Yorker is a work of art, as worthy of comment and analysis as, say, Keats’s “Ode on a Grecian Urn.” Each week I review one or more aspects of the magazine’s latest issue. I suppose it’s possible to describe and analyze an entire issue, but I prefer to keep my reviews brief, and so I usually focus on just one or two pieces, to explore in each the signature style of its author. A piece by Nick Paumgarten is not like a piece by Jill Lepore, and neither is like a piece by Ian Frazier. One could not mistake Collins for Seabrook, or Bilger for Galchen, or Mogelson for Kolbert. Each has found a style, and it is that style that I respond to as I read, and want to understand and describe.

Saturday, July 29, 2017

Paul Mazursky's "An Unmarried Woman": Brody v. Kael


Richard Brody’s recent capsule review of Paul Mazursky’s An Unmarried Woman (The New Yorker, July 24, 2017) spurs me to see this film again. I first saw it in 1978, when it was released. That’s thirty-nine years ago. Today, my only recollection of it is a vague image of burly Alan Bates slathering a canvas with paint. Brody calls the movie an “instant-classic drama.” He writes,

Mazursky’s achievement is distinctively choreographic: for all the trenchant conversation, he sets the characters into mad motion, alone and together—jogging, dancing, fighting, strolling, embracing—and even the static set pieces, in bars and at dinner tables, have the sculptural authority of frozen ballets.

This seems to contradict Pauline Kael’s view of it. In her “Empathy, and Its Limits” (The New Yorker, March 6, 1978; included in her 1980 collection, When the Lights Go Down), she says,

The cinematography, by Arthur Ornitz, which features windows and skyline views, doesn’t have anything like the sun-spangled vivacity that Gordon Willis brought to the New York of Annie Hall (a film with related states of anxiety). Ornitz is an inexpressive realist; he makes images “real” by sapping the life out of them. (There is no dynamism even when the camera moves.) But his work here is more delicately muted and less grungy than usual – the SoHo streets seem to spark him.

Kael’s response to An Unmarried Woman was mixed. She says, “It’s an enormously friendly, soft-edged picture. Yet there’s a lot of hot air circulating in it.” She’s critical of Mazursky, one of her favorite directors, for suppressing his sense of satire, particularly in relation to the character Erica, who Kael finds “puny and a bit of an idiot” (see Kael’s capsule review in her 5001 Nights at the Movies).   

It’s likely Kael’s review influenced my response when I first saw the movie back in ’78. Brody’s review provides a fresh take, focusing more on the film’s design than on its characters.

Interestingly, when Kael collected what she considered her best reviews in For Keeps (1994), she excluded “Empathy, and Its Limits.” Maybe she had second thoughts about its validity.  

Thursday, July 27, 2017

July 24, 2017 Issue


Pick of the Issue this week is Danielle Allen’s riveting “personal history” piece, “American Inferno,” an account of her fifteen-year-old cousin’s descent into crime, prison, and eventual death, notwithstanding Allen’s considerable efforts to save him. It’s a powerful blend of elegy, argument, analysis, and anger. It’s also beautifully crafted. Consider the opening paragraph:

What sets the course of a life? Three years before my beloved cousin’s murder—before the weeping, before the raging, before the heated self-recriminations and icy reckonings—I awoke with the most glorious sense of anticipation I’ve ever felt. It was June 29, 2006, the day that Michael was going to be freed. Outside my vacation condo in Hollywood, I climbed into the old white BMW I’d bought from my mother and headed to my aunt’s small stucco home, in South Central. On the corner, a fortified drug house stood like a sentry, but her pale cottage seemed serene, aglow in the morning sun. Poverty never looks quite as bad in the City of Angels as it does elsewhere.

All the key ingredients of Allen’s approach are here: inquiry, tragedy, feeling, specificity. This passage immediately drew me in. I entered Allen’s world – a starkly contrasting place, divided between her own successful life as dean of humanities at the University of Chicago and that of her cousin, Michael, struggling to start over after spending eleven years in prison for attempted carjacking. Michael, age fifteen, was sentenced to eleven years in adult prison. That is the central, sorry, horrific fact of this piece. How could that be? Allen writes,

The narrative so far is familiar. A kid from a troubled home, trapped in poverty, without a stable world of adults coördinating care for him, starts pilfering, mostly out of an impatience to have things. In Michael’s first fourteen years, his story includes not a single incidence of violence, aside from the usual wrestling matches with siblings. It could have had any number of possible endings. But events unfold along a single track. As we make decisions, and decisions are made for us, we shed the lives that might have been. In Michael’s fifteenth year, his life accelerated, like a cylinder in one of those pneumatic tubes, whisking off your deposit at a drive-through bank. To understand how that acceleration could happen, though, another story is needed.

That story is the sad, rotten history of California’s Three Strikes and You’re Out Law, which took discretion out of the judges’ hands and replaced it with harsh mandatory sentencing. Allen says,

The legislators who voted to try as adults sixteen-year-olds, and then fourteen-year-olds, were not interested in retribution. They had become deterrence theorists. They were designing sentences not for people but for a thing: the aggregate level of crime. They wanted to reduce that level, regardless of what constituted justice for any individual involved. The target of Michael’s sentence was not a bright fifteen-year-old boy with a mild proclivity for theft but the thousands of carjackings that occurred in Los Angeles. Deterrence dehumanizes. It directs at the individual the full hatred that society understandably has for an aggregate phenomenon. But no individual should bear that kind of responsibility.

So fifteen-year-old Michael spent the next eleven years of life in prison, including the notoriously tough Chino. What was that like? Allen tells us:

The years between the ages of fifteen and twenty-six are punctuated by familiar milestones: high school, driver’s license, college, first love, first job, first serious relationship, perhaps marriage, possibly a child. For those who pass adolescence in prison, some of these rites disappear; the ones that occur take on a distorted shape. And extra milestones get added. First long-term separation from family. First racial melee. First time in solitary, formally known as “administrative segregation.” First time sodomized.

When, on June 29, 2006, Michael is released from California Rehabilitation Center-Norco, his family, including Allen, is there to meet him. With their support, his chances of successfully restarting his life seem promising. Allen writes,

Driving back to South Central, my mood was all melody. I imagined Michael felt the same. Little more than a month out and here he was, with a driver’s license, a bank account, a library card, and a job. He was enrolled in college, with a clean, safe, comfortable place to live. This was a starter set for a life, enabling him to defy the pattern of parolees.

But Michael has changed. While in prison he’d fallen in love with another inmate, a relationship that continued, unbeknownst to Allen, after they were released from prison. The relationship was violent. It ended in Michael’s murder. He was just twenty-nine. But for Allen’s potent memoir of him, he likely would’ve disappeared into oblivion like most of the other thousands of black youths incarcerated under Three Strikes who went on to violent death. Allen’s “American Inferno” preserves his memory. It’s a magnificent piece.

Postscript: This week’s issue brims with great writing. In addition to Danielle Allen’s extraordinary “American Inferno,” there’s Matthew Trammell’s “Night Life: Past Customs” (“buzzy synths swell into prominence like a takeoff, asymmetrical percussion mimics the metallic dance of landing gear unfolding, and talk-box samples evoke the chorus of voices, automated and analog, that echo through terminal halls”), Talia Lavin’s “Bar Tab: Highlands” (“The Catholic Guilt left a taste of anise on the tongue”), Richard Brody’s capsule review of Paul Mazursky’s An Unmarried Woman (“he sets the characters into mad motion, alone and together—jogging, dancing, fighting, strolling, embracing—and even the static set pieces, in bars and at dinner tables, have the sculptural authority of frozen ballets”), James Wood’s “Handle With Care,” a review of Joshua Cohen’s new novel Moving Kings (“Style is a patent priority: his fiction displays the stretch marks of its originality”), and Alex Ross’s “Tank Music” (“A moment later, the storm broke. Gusts buffeting the exterior created an apocalyptic bass rumble; lashes of rain sounded like a hundred snare drums. The voices bobbed on the welter of noise, sometimes disappearing into it and sometimes riding above”) – all superb!

Sunday, July 16, 2017

July 10 & 17, 2017 Issue


Clive James, in his wonderful poem “A Heritage of Trumpets,” in this week’s issue, picks up from where he left off in his Poetry Notebook (2014), the last chapter of which is titled “Trumpets at Sunset.” For James, it seems, the trumpet, when it’s played “with definition, lyrical and real,” the way, say, Bunk Johnson, Buddy Bolden, Bill Coleman, and Louis Armstrong played it, evokes the bittersweet mixture of elation and elegy (“The controlled sensation / Of vaulting gold that drove a funeral then / Linked death to dancing people, grief to joy”) that James is feeling as he approaches life’s end (“the dying voice of silence”). I love that “Blaze away / Into the dark, bugler. Be sure the night / Reflects your song with every point of light” – James’s inspired variation on Dylan Thomas’s  “Do not go gentle into that good night / Rage, rage against the dying of the light.”

James’s poem contains at least one other allusion, as well – “Play that thing!” – an invocation of Philip Larkin’s great “For Sidney Bechet,” in which Larkin, apparently listening to a recording of Bechet as he writes the poem, gets so caught up in his intense response to it, he suddenly shouts out, “Oh, play that thing!” James’s use of the line allows us to be aware simultaneously of Larkin’s original melody and the new melody based on it, the poetic equivalent of jazz improvisation. Brilliant!

Saturday, July 15, 2017

5 Great "New Yorker" River Pieces


James Graves, "St. John River" (1976)












I love rivers and I love river stories – especially factual ones. The New Yorker has a long history of great river writing. Here are five of my favorites, with a choice quotation from each in brackets:

1. Berton Roueché, “The River World,” The New Yorker, February 26, 1972; included in Roueché’s 1978 collection, The River World and Other Explorations (“At the head of the tow, where I am sitting on a coil of rigging near the bow of the starboard barge, there is the feeling of a raft – a peaceful sense of drifting, a sense of country quiet. The only sound is the slap of water under the rake of the bow. I am alone and half asleep in the silence and the warmth of the mild midmorning sun. The river is empty. There is only the bend ahead, a sandy shore of brush and willows on the near bank, and a steep bluff crowned with cottonwoods a quarter of a mile away on the other – no towns, no houses, no bridges, no roads, not even another boat”).

2. John McPhee, “The Keel of Lake Dickey,” The New Yorker, May 3, 1976; included in McPhee’s 1979 collection, Giving Good Weight (“We are a bend or two below the Priestly Rapid, and we can see more than a mile ahead before the river turns from view. Bank to bank, the current is running fast. It is May 28th. The ice went out about a month ago. We have seen remnant snow in shadowed places on the edges of the river. The hardwoods are just budding, and they are scattered among the conifers, so the riverine hills are bright and dark green, streaked with the white stems of canoe birch”).

3. Bill Barich, “Steelhead,” The New Yorker, March 2, 1981; retitled “Steelhead on the Russian,” in Barich’s 1984 collection, Traveling Light (“From my available gear, I’d assembled a kitful of lures and a makeshift steelhead rig – an eight-foot fiberglass rod and a medium-sized spinning reel wound with twelve-pound test – and I took it in hand and walked off into a seemingly static landscape that could have been painted by Hokusai: twisted live oak trees, barren willows, new winter grass, and vineyards laced with yellow mustard flowers, everything cloaked in river mist”).

4. Alec Wilkinson, “The Riverkeeper,” The New Yorker, May 11, 1987; included in Wilkinson’s 1990 collection, The Riverkeeper (“I went out with him one evening in December to look at a cove that is so choked in the summer with water chestnuts that he can’t get the boat into it, and we came home in the dark, and it was really cold, and the water was so smooth that the sensation of crossing it was almost like flying. I have been out with him on hot, hazy days when the river is gray and the sky is white and the hills in the distance are blue. I made a trip with him one spring day from Cold Spring to Catskill Creek – sixty miles. In Poughkeepsie, we stopped and watched police divers haul the body of a drowned man from the river. We spent the night in a slip at Hop-O-Nose Marine, on Catskill Creek. Herring jumped all night in the creek. It sounded like someone spooning water from a basin with his hands”).

5. Ian Frazier, “Five Fish,” The New Yorker, October 8, 2001; included in Frazier’s 2002 collection, The Fish’s Eye (“Storm clouds moved in, and the afternoon light became a wintry gloom. Snow began to fall hard, hissing in the bare branches of the cottonwood trees. The river scenery – bare-rock bluffs, dark-red willows, and tawny grasses along the shore – faded like something you see as you fall asleep. Daryl and I waded in deeper, crossed the river, tried different spots. The water in the Bitterroot actually felt warmer than the melted snow trickling around our ears. My fly line began to make a raspy sound in the line guides as it passed over the edges of ice building up in them. Steam rose from the water and moved in genie-sized wisps with the current”).

Credit: The above illustration by James Graves is from John McPhee’s ““The Keel of Lake Dickey” (The New Yorker, May 3, 1976).  

Sunday, July 9, 2017

July 3, 2017 Issue


This week’s New Yorker has yet to arrive in the mail. Rather than wait any longer, I’ve decided to pick one piece from the newyorker.com version and comment on it. My choice is Adam Gopnik’s “Hemingway, the Sensualist,” a review of Mary V. Dearborn’s new biography, Hemingway. Gopnik’s title is excellent, getting at exactly the quality of Hemingway’s writing that most appeals to me – its sensual responsiveness. Gopnik says,

The stoical stance has been much celebrated—“grace under pressure” and the rest—but the sensual touch is the more frequent material of the prose. Whether at Michigan trout streams or Pamplona fiestas or those Paris boîtes, there is a strong element of “travel writing.” He wrote pleasure far better than violence.

This is well said. My favorite Hemingway work is his Paris memoir, A Moveable Feast (1964), in which his “sensual touch” is evident in almost every line. Here, for example, is his description of eating oysters at a café on the Place St.-Michel:

As I ate the oysters with their strong taste of the sea and their faint metallic taste that the cold white wine washed away, leaving only the sea taste and the succulent texture, and as I drank their cold liquid from each shell and washed it down with the crisp taste of wine, I lost the empty feeling and began to be happy and to make plans.

My only quibble with Gopnik’s piece is that it slights Hemingway’s journalism. Gopnik says, “But, as much as generations of newspapermen have claimed him as a student of newspaper style, nothing memorable emerges from the collected journalism.” I disagree. There’s a reporting piece called “Christmas on the Roof of the World” (The Toronto Star Weekly, December 22, 1923; included in the 1967 collection By-line: Ernest Hemingway, edited by William White) that I rate right up there with Hemingway’s best short stories. It’s an account of a Christmas Day that Hemingway, his wife, Hadley, and their best friend, Chink, spent skiing in the Swiss Alps. From beginning to end, it’s a rush of action and excitement, climaxing in the run down the mountain (“But there is no place to go except down. Down in a rushing, swooping, flying, plunging rush of fast ash blades through the powder snow”). The pleasure principle is commandingly strong in this piece, as it is in all of Hemingway’s best writing.

Tuesday, July 4, 2017

Benoit Pilon's Evocative "Iqaluit"


A still from Benoit Pilon's "Iqaluit" (2016)












It’s been almost a week since I saw Benoit Pilon’s Iqaluit, but I find myself still thinking about it. The plot is engaging enough, involving the suspicious death of a French-Canadian construction worker and his widow’s attempt to find out what happened. But, for me, the film’s great strength is its evocation of Iqaluit - the beach, the houses, the gravel roads, the breakwater, the graveyard, the river, the bay, the tundra, etc. It conveys a deep, poetic feeling for the place. The images have been brilliantly selected. It’s beautifully shot. Watching it, I found myself longing to be back there.

Monday, July 3, 2017

Fireworks


A couple of nights ago, Lorna and I attended the Canada Day celebrations in Charlottetown’s Victoria Park. Rowan, our two-year-old grandson, came with us. I stood, holding him in my arms, as round after round of spectacular fireworks were launched. Rowan gazed up at the explosions of luminous red, green, and gold glitter. He was smiling. At one point, he said, “I want to eat them,” reached out, grabbed an imaginary handful of sparkles, and popped them in his mouth.

Rowan’s appetitive response to fireworks reminded me of Peter Schjeldahl’s passion for Fourth of July bottle-rocketing, which he’s expressed in two wonderful pieces – “Fireworks” (in his 1990 collection, The 7 Days Art Columns 1988-1990) and “The Pyro-American in Me” (newyorker.com, July 3, 2016). In the latter piece, he likens fireworks to music. He writes,

My personal pleasure required the most physical practical sequencing: fulminant jazz, call it—without, incidentally, the kitsch of musical accompaniment. Fireworks are music. (Our valley made for richly satisfying echoes.) Professionals obsess, preciously, about the beauty of their shells. But fireworks can’t help but be beautiful. I cared far less for quality than for quantity. With fireworks, more than enough is wonderful. Apropos more than that, words fail.

Another memorable New Yorker piece on fireworks is Adam Gopnik’s “French Fireworks” (newyorker.com, July 15, 2009), an account of his attendance at Paris’s Fête Nationale. He describes the lighting of the Eiffel Tower (“By manipulating this projected image of the tower, overlaid on the thing itself, the designers managed to make it seem to spin, disassemble, paint itself red, white, and blue, turn into a psychedelic sixties-style monument complete with Day-Glo flowers, and, in the end, actually shake its hips”) and the fireworks that went with it (“And all this was accompanied by uninterrupted and achingly loud fireworks, particularly heavy on the pure-gold and amber end of the spectrum, and with gas jets at the tower’s center flaring at high moments of emotion”). Gopnik ends his piece by noting, “There are some things that only government can do well: alpine uniforms, health care, and fireworks displays would seem to be three of them.”

I don’t know about alpine uniforms, but with respect to health care and fireworks, I totally agree.

Saturday, July 1, 2017

Imaginary Interview: On the Making of "Mid-Year Top Ten (2017)"


Dolly Faibyshev, "Mermaid Spa"












This year’s “Mid-Year Top Ten (2017)” is the eighth in a series that began in 2010, the year this blog was launched. All were composed by New Yorker & Me staff writer John MacDougall. We asked him to reflect on his work.

What’s the point of these lists?

They’re a way for me to take stock of my New Yorker reading experience.

What criteria do you use to pick and rank the pieces?

Pleasure is my guide.

Well, what do you look for in a piece of writing? What gives you pleasure?

Are you familiar with James Wood’s definition of “thisness”?

Refresh my memory.

Thisness is any detail that draws abstraction toward itself and seems to kill that abstraction with a puff of palpability, any detail that centers our attention with its concretion. Wood wrote that in his great How Fiction Works. It’s one of my touchstones. It expresses perfectly the quality in writing I most relish. The New Yorker brims with it.

I notice that this year’s “Mid-Year Top Ten” contains a “Goings On About Town” list. That’s a new feature, isn’t it?

Yes, it is. Over the last couple of years, “Goings On About Town” has become my favorite section of the magazine.

Why is that?

I think it has to do with my preference for description over narrative. “Goings On About Town” contains an abundance of great description.

Give me an example.

Well, the one that immediately comes to mind is Becky Cooper’s brilliant “Tables For Two” piece on Mermaid Spa, in which, in detail after sensuous detail, she describes the dining room, the sauna, the steam room, and the food. For me, it’s one of the most memorable pieces of the year so far – right up there with Luke Mogelson’s “The Avengers of Mosul” and John Kinsella’s “Milking the Tiger Snake.”

Your lists are always positive. Have you ever considered including a “worst” or “most disappointing” category?

No. My list is a fan’s list. I like to keep it positive.

Is your list in anyway biased?

Yes, I readily admit I have favorites – Ian Frazier, James Wood, and Peter Schjeldahl, to name three. I relish Robert Sullivan’s writing. Anytime he appears in the magazine, I try to get him on my list.

Who do you think reads these lists? Who’s your target audience?

I’m not sure who reads them. I don’t have a target. I make them for their own sake. They’re my way of paying homage to The New Yorker – to the many writers, editors, and artists who produce it. Also, these lists afford me the pleasure of revisiting the magazine pieces and savoring my favorite passages.

Do you foresee a time when your enthusiasm for The New Yorker will wane and you’ll stop making these lists?

No. I’m totally hooked on The New Yorker. If anything, my addiction is intensifying.