Saturday, July 29, 2017
Paul Mazursky's "An Unmarried Woman": Brody v. Kael
Richard Brody’s recent capsule review of Paul Mazursky’s An Unmarried Woman (The New Yorker, July 24, 2017) spurs me to see this film again. I
first saw it in 1978, when it was released. That’s thirty-nine years ago.
Today, my only recollection of it is a vague image of burly Alan Bates
slathering a canvas with paint. Brody calls the movie an “instant-classic drama.”
He writes,
Mazursky’s achievement is distinctively choreographic: for
all the trenchant conversation, he sets the characters into mad motion, alone
and together—jogging, dancing, fighting, strolling, embracing—and even the
static set pieces, in bars and at dinner tables, have the sculptural authority
of frozen ballets.
This seems to contradict Pauline Kael’s view of it. In her
“Empathy, and Its Limits” (The New Yorker,
March 6, 1978; included in her 1980 collection, When the Lights Go Down), she says,
The cinematography, by Arthur Ornitz, which features windows
and skyline views, doesn’t have anything like the sun-spangled vivacity that
Gordon Willis brought to the New York of Annie Hall (a film with related states
of anxiety). Ornitz is an inexpressive realist; he makes images “real” by sapping
the life out of them. (There is no dynamism even when the camera moves.) But
his work here is more delicately muted and less grungy than usual – the SoHo
streets seem to spark him.
Kael’s response to An
Unmarried Woman was mixed. She says, “It’s an enormously friendly,
soft-edged picture. Yet there’s a lot of hot air circulating in it.” She’s
critical of Mazursky, one of her favorite directors, for suppressing his sense
of satire, particularly in relation to the character Erica, who Kael finds
“puny and a bit of an idiot” (see Kael’s capsule review in her 5001 Nights at the Movies).
It’s likely Kael’s review influenced my response when I
first saw the movie back in ’78. Brody’s review provides a fresh take, focusing
more on the film’s design than on its characters.
Thursday, July 27, 2017
July 24, 2017 Issue
Pick of the Issue this week is Danielle Allen’s riveting
“personal history” piece, “American Inferno,” an account of her
fifteen-year-old cousin’s descent into crime, prison, and eventual death,
notwithstanding Allen’s considerable efforts to save him. It’s a powerful blend
of elegy, argument, analysis, and anger. It’s also beautifully crafted.
Consider the opening paragraph:
What sets the course of a life? Three years before my
beloved cousin’s murder—before the weeping, before the raging, before the
heated self-recriminations and icy reckonings—I awoke with the most glorious
sense of anticipation I’ve ever felt. It was June 29, 2006, the day that
Michael was going to be freed. Outside my vacation condo in Hollywood, I
climbed into the old white BMW I’d bought from my mother and headed to my
aunt’s small stucco home, in South Central. On the corner, a fortified drug
house stood like a sentry, but her pale cottage seemed serene, aglow in the
morning sun. Poverty never looks quite as bad in the City of Angels as it does
elsewhere.
All the key ingredients of Allen’s approach are here:
inquiry, tragedy, feeling, specificity. This passage immediately drew me in. I
entered Allen’s world – a starkly contrasting place, divided between her own
successful life as dean of humanities at the University of Chicago and that of
her cousin, Michael, struggling to start over after spending eleven years in
prison for attempted carjacking. Michael, age fifteen, was sentenced to eleven
years in adult prison. That is the central, sorry, horrific fact of this piece.
How could that be? Allen writes,
The narrative so far is familiar. A kid from a troubled
home, trapped in poverty, without a stable world of adults coördinating care
for him, starts pilfering, mostly out of an impatience to have things. In
Michael’s first fourteen years, his story includes not a single incidence of
violence, aside from the usual wrestling matches with siblings. It could have
had any number of possible endings. But events unfold along a single track. As
we make decisions, and decisions are made for us, we shed the lives that might
have been. In Michael’s fifteenth year, his life accelerated, like a cylinder
in one of those pneumatic tubes, whisking off your deposit at a drive-through
bank. To understand how that acceleration could happen, though, another story
is needed.
That story is the sad, rotten history of California’s Three
Strikes and You’re Out Law, which took discretion out of the judges’ hands and
replaced it with harsh mandatory sentencing. Allen says,
The legislators who voted to try as adults
sixteen-year-olds, and then fourteen-year-olds, were not interested in
retribution. They had become deterrence theorists. They were designing
sentences not for people but for a thing: the aggregate level of crime. They
wanted to reduce that level, regardless of what constituted justice for any
individual involved. The target of Michael’s sentence was not a bright
fifteen-year-old boy with a mild proclivity for theft but the thousands of
carjackings that occurred in Los Angeles. Deterrence dehumanizes. It directs at
the individual the full hatred that society understandably has for an aggregate
phenomenon. But no individual should bear that kind of responsibility.
So fifteen-year-old Michael spent the next eleven years of
life in prison, including the notoriously tough Chino. What was that like?
Allen tells us:
The years between the ages of fifteen and twenty-six are
punctuated by familiar milestones: high school, driver’s license, college,
first love, first job, first serious relationship, perhaps marriage, possibly a
child. For those who pass adolescence in prison, some of these rites disappear;
the ones that occur take on a distorted shape. And extra milestones get added.
First long-term separation from family. First racial melee. First time in
solitary, formally known as “administrative segregation.” First time sodomized.
When, on June 29, 2006, Michael is released from California
Rehabilitation Center-Norco, his family, including Allen, is there to meet him.
With their support, his chances of successfully restarting his life seem
promising. Allen writes,
Driving back to South Central, my mood was all melody. I
imagined Michael felt the same. Little more than a month out and here he was,
with a driver’s license, a bank account, a library card, and a job. He was
enrolled in college, with a clean, safe, comfortable place to live. This was a
starter set for a life, enabling him to defy the pattern of parolees.
But Michael has changed. While in prison he’d fallen in love
with another inmate, a relationship that continued, unbeknownst to Allen, after
they were released from prison. The relationship was violent. It ended in
Michael’s murder. He was just twenty-nine. But for Allen’s potent memoir of
him, he likely would’ve disappeared into oblivion like most of the other
thousands of black youths incarcerated under Three Strikes who went on to
violent death. Allen’s “American Inferno” preserves his memory. It’s a
magnificent piece.
Postscript: This week’s issue brims with great writing. In addition to Danielle Allen’s extraordinary “American Inferno,” there’s Matthew Trammell’s “Night Life: Past Customs” (“buzzy synths swell into prominence like a takeoff, asymmetrical percussion mimics the metallic dance of landing gear unfolding, and talk-box samples evoke the chorus of voices, automated and analog, that echo through terminal halls”), Talia Lavin’s “Bar Tab: Highlands” (“The Catholic Guilt left a taste of anise on the tongue”), Richard Brody’s capsule review of Paul Mazursky’s An Unmarried Woman (“he sets the characters into mad motion, alone and together—jogging, dancing, fighting, strolling, embracing—and even the static set pieces, in bars and at dinner tables, have the sculptural authority of frozen ballets”), James Wood’s “Handle With Care,” a review of Joshua Cohen’s new novel Moving Kings (“Style is a patent priority: his fiction displays the stretch marks of its originality”), and Alex Ross’s “Tank Music” (“A moment later, the storm broke. Gusts buffeting the exterior created an apocalyptic bass rumble; lashes of rain sounded like a hundred snare drums. The voices bobbed on the welter of noise, sometimes disappearing into it and sometimes riding above”) – all superb!
Sunday, July 16, 2017
July 10 & 17, 2017 Issue
Clive James, in his wonderful poem “A Heritage of Trumpets,” in this week’s issue, picks up from where he left off in his Poetry Notebook (2014), the last chapter
of which is titled “Trumpets at Sunset.” For James, it seems, the trumpet, when
it’s played “with definition, lyrical and real,” the way, say, Bunk Johnson,
Buddy Bolden, Bill Coleman, and Louis Armstrong played it, evokes the
bittersweet mixture of elation and elegy (“The controlled sensation / Of
vaulting gold that drove a funeral then / Linked death to dancing people, grief
to joy”) that James is feeling as he approaches life’s end (“the dying voice of
silence”). I love that “Blaze away / Into the dark, bugler. Be sure the night / Reflects your song with every point of light” – James’s
inspired variation on Dylan Thomas’s “Do
not go gentle into that good night / Rage, rage against the dying of the
light.”
James’s poem contains at least one other allusion, as well – “Play that thing!” – an invocation of Philip Larkin’s great “For Sidney Bechet,” in which Larkin, apparently listening to a recording of Bechet as he writes the poem, gets so caught up in his intense response to it, he suddenly shouts out, “Oh, play that thing!” James’s use of the line allows us to be aware simultaneously of Larkin’s original melody and the new melody based on it, the poetic equivalent of jazz improvisation. Brilliant!
Saturday, July 15, 2017
5 Great "New Yorker" River Pieces
James Graves, "St. John River" (1976) |
I love rivers and I love river stories – especially factual
ones. The New Yorker has a long history of great river writing. Here are five
of my favorites, with a choice quotation from each in brackets:
1. Berton Roueché, “The River World,” The New Yorker, February 26, 1972; included in Roueché’s 1978 collection,
The River World and Other Explorations
(“At the head of the tow, where I am sitting on a coil of rigging near the bow
of the starboard barge, there is the feeling of a raft – a peaceful sense of
drifting, a sense of country quiet. The only sound is the slap of water under
the rake of the bow. I am alone and half asleep in the silence and the warmth
of the mild midmorning sun. The river is empty. There is only the bend ahead, a
sandy shore of brush and willows on the near bank, and a steep bluff crowned
with cottonwoods a quarter of a mile away on the other – no towns, no houses,
no bridges, no roads, not even another boat”).
2. John McPhee, “The Keel of Lake Dickey,” The New Yorker, May 3, 1976; included in
McPhee’s 1979 collection, Giving Good
Weight (“We are a bend or two below the Priestly Rapid, and we can see more
than a mile ahead before the river turns from view. Bank to bank, the current
is running fast. It is May 28th. The ice went out about a month ago.
We have seen remnant snow in shadowed places on the edges of the river. The
hardwoods are just budding, and they are scattered among the conifers, so the
riverine hills are bright and dark green, streaked with the white stems of
canoe birch”).
3. Bill Barich, “Steelhead,” The New Yorker, March 2, 1981; retitled “Steelhead on the Russian,”
in Barich’s 1984 collection, Traveling
Light (“From my available gear, I’d assembled a kitful of lures and a
makeshift steelhead rig – an eight-foot fiberglass rod and a medium-sized
spinning reel wound with twelve-pound test – and I took it in hand and walked
off into a seemingly static landscape that could have been painted by Hokusai:
twisted live oak trees, barren willows, new winter grass, and vineyards laced
with yellow mustard flowers, everything cloaked in river mist”).
4. Alec Wilkinson, “The Riverkeeper,” The New Yorker, May 11, 1987; included in Wilkinson’s 1990
collection, The Riverkeeper (“I went
out with him one evening in December to look at a cove that is so choked in the
summer with water chestnuts that he can’t get the boat into it, and we came
home in the dark, and it was really cold, and the water was so smooth that the
sensation of crossing it was almost like flying. I have been out with him on
hot, hazy days when the river is gray and the sky is white and the hills in the
distance are blue. I made a trip with him one spring day from Cold Spring to
Catskill Creek – sixty miles. In Poughkeepsie, we stopped and watched police
divers haul the body of a drowned man from the river. We spent the night in a
slip at Hop-O-Nose Marine, on Catskill Creek. Herring jumped all night in the
creek. It sounded like someone spooning water from a basin with his hands”).
5. Ian Frazier, “Five Fish,” The New Yorker, October 8, 2001; included in Frazier’s 2002
collection, The Fish’s Eye (“Storm
clouds moved in, and the afternoon light became a wintry gloom. Snow began to
fall hard, hissing in the bare branches of the cottonwood trees. The river scenery
– bare-rock bluffs, dark-red willows, and tawny grasses along the shore – faded
like something you see as you fall asleep. Daryl and I waded in deeper, crossed
the river, tried different spots. The water in the Bitterroot actually felt
warmer than the melted snow trickling around our ears. My fly line began to
make a raspy sound in the line guides as it passed over the edges of ice
building up in them. Steam rose from the water and moved in genie-sized wisps
with the current”).
Credit: The above illustration by James Graves is from John McPhee’s
““The Keel of Lake Dickey” (The New
Yorker, May 3, 1976).
Sunday, July 9, 2017
July 3, 2017 Issue
This week’s New Yorker
has yet to arrive in the mail. Rather than wait any longer, I’ve decided to
pick one piece from the newyorker.com version and comment on it. My choice is
Adam Gopnik’s “Hemingway, the Sensualist,” a review of Mary V. Dearborn’s new
biography, Hemingway. Gopnik’s title
is excellent, getting at exactly the quality of Hemingway’s writing that most
appeals to me – its sensual responsiveness. Gopnik says,
The stoical stance has been much celebrated—“grace under
pressure” and the rest—but the sensual touch is the more frequent material of
the prose. Whether at Michigan trout streams or Pamplona fiestas or those Paris
boîtes, there is a strong element of “travel writing.” He wrote pleasure far
better than violence.
This is well said. My favorite Hemingway work is his Paris
memoir, A Moveable Feast (1964), in
which his “sensual touch” is evident in almost every line. Here, for example,
is his description of eating oysters at a café on the Place St.-Michel:
As I ate the oysters with their strong taste of the sea and
their faint metallic taste that the cold white wine washed away, leaving only
the sea taste and the succulent texture, and as I drank their cold liquid from
each shell and washed it down with the crisp taste of wine, I lost the empty
feeling and began to be happy and to make plans.
My only quibble with Gopnik’s piece is that it slights Hemingway’s journalism. Gopnik says, “But, as much as generations of newspapermen have claimed him as a student of newspaper style, nothing memorable emerges from the collected journalism.” I disagree. There’s a reporting piece called “Christmas on the Roof of the World” (The Toronto Star Weekly, December 22, 1923; included in the 1967 collection By-line: Ernest Hemingway, edited by William White) that I rate right up there with Hemingway’s best short stories. It’s an account of a Christmas Day that Hemingway, his wife, Hadley, and their best friend, Chink, spent skiing in the Swiss Alps. From beginning to end, it’s a rush of action and excitement, climaxing in the run down the mountain (“But there is no place to go except down. Down in a rushing, swooping, flying, plunging rush of fast ash blades through the powder snow”). The pleasure principle is commandingly strong in this piece, as it is in all of Hemingway’s best writing.
Labels:
Adam Gopnik,
Ernest Hemingway,
The New Yorker
Tuesday, July 4, 2017
Benoit Pilon's Evocative "Iqaluit"
A still from Benoit Pilon's "Iqaluit" (2016) |
It’s been almost a week since I saw Benoit Pilon’s Iqaluit, but I find myself still thinking about it. The plot is engaging enough, involving the suspicious death of a French-Canadian construction worker and his widow’s attempt to find out what happened. But, for me, the film’s great strength is its evocation of Iqaluit - the beach, the houses, the gravel roads, the breakwater, the graveyard, the river, the bay, the tundra, etc. It conveys a deep, poetic feeling for the place. The images have been brilliantly selected. It’s beautifully shot. Watching it, I found myself longing to be back there.
Monday, July 3, 2017
Fireworks
A couple of nights ago, Lorna and I attended the Canada Day
celebrations in Charlottetown’s Victoria Park. Rowan, our two-year-old grandson,
came with us. I stood, holding him in my
arms, as round after round of spectacular fireworks were launched. Rowan gazed
up at the explosions of luminous red, green, and gold glitter. He was smiling.
At one point, he said, “I want to eat them,” reached out, grabbed an imaginary
handful of sparkles, and popped them in his mouth.
Rowan’s appetitive response to fireworks reminded me of
Peter Schjeldahl’s passion for Fourth of July bottle-rocketing, which he’s
expressed in two wonderful pieces – “Fireworks” (in his 1990 collection, The 7 Days Art Columns 1988-1990) and “The Pyro-American in Me” (newyorker.com, July 3, 2016). In the latter piece, he likens fireworks to
music. He writes,
My personal pleasure required the most physical practical
sequencing: fulminant jazz, call it—without, incidentally, the kitsch of
musical accompaniment. Fireworks are music. (Our valley made for
richly satisfying echoes.) Professionals obsess, preciously, about the beauty
of their shells. But fireworks can’t help but be beautiful. I cared far less
for quality than for quantity. With fireworks, more than enough is wonderful.
Apropos more than that, words fail.
Another memorable New
Yorker piece on fireworks is Adam Gopnik’s “French Fireworks” (newyorker.com, July 15, 2009), an account of his attendance at Paris’s Fête
Nationale. He describes the lighting of the Eiffel Tower (“By manipulating this
projected image of the tower, overlaid on the thing itself, the designers
managed to make it seem to spin, disassemble, paint itself red, white, and
blue, turn into a psychedelic sixties-style monument complete with Day-Glo
flowers, and, in the end, actually shake its hips”) and the fireworks that went
with it (“And all this was accompanied by uninterrupted and achingly loud
fireworks, particularly heavy on the pure-gold and amber end of the spectrum,
and with gas jets at the tower’s center flaring at high moments of emotion”).
Gopnik ends his piece by noting, “There are some things that only government
can do well: alpine uniforms, health care, and fireworks displays would seem to
be three of them.”
I don’t know about alpine uniforms, but with respect to health care and fireworks, I totally agree.
Labels:
Adam Gopnik,
Peter Schjeldahl,
The New Yorker
Saturday, July 1, 2017
Imaginary Interview: On the Making of "Mid-Year Top Ten (2017)"
Dolly Faibyshev, "Mermaid Spa" |
This year’s “Mid-Year Top Ten (2017)” is the eighth in a
series that began in 2010, the year this blog was launched. All
were composed by New Yorker & Me staff
writer John MacDougall. We asked him to reflect on his work.
What’s the point of
these lists?
They’re a way for me to take stock of my New Yorker reading experience.
What criteria do you
use to pick and rank the pieces?
Pleasure is my guide.
Well, what do you look
for in a piece of writing? What gives you pleasure?
Are you familiar with James Wood’s definition of “thisness”?
Refresh my memory.
Thisness is any detail that draws abstraction toward itself
and seems to kill that abstraction with a puff of palpability, any detail that
centers our attention with its concretion. Wood wrote that in his great How Fiction Works. It’s one of my
touchstones. It expresses perfectly the quality in writing I most relish. The New Yorker brims with it.
I notice that this
year’s “Mid-Year Top Ten” contains a “Goings On About Town” list. That’s a new
feature, isn’t it?
Yes, it is. Over the last couple of years, “Goings On About
Town” has become my favorite section of the magazine.
Why is that?
I think it has to do with my preference for description over
narrative. “Goings On About Town” contains an abundance of great description.
Give me an example.
Well, the one that immediately comes to mind is Becky
Cooper’s brilliant “Tables For Two” piece on Mermaid Spa, in which, in detail
after sensuous detail, she describes the dining room, the sauna, the steam
room, and the food. For me, it’s one of the most memorable pieces of the year
so far – right up there with Luke Mogelson’s “The Avengers of Mosul” and John
Kinsella’s “Milking the Tiger Snake.”
Your lists are always
positive. Have you ever considered including a “worst” or “most disappointing”
category?
No. My list is a fan’s list. I like to keep it positive.
Is your list in anyway
biased?
Yes, I readily admit I have favorites – Ian Frazier, James
Wood, and Peter Schjeldahl, to name three. I relish Robert Sullivan’s writing.
Anytime he appears in the magazine, I try to get him on my list.
Who do you think reads
these lists? Who’s your target audience?
I’m not sure who reads them. I don’t have a target. I make
them for their own sake. They’re my way of paying homage to The New Yorker – to the many writers,
editors, and artists who produce it. Also, these lists afford me the pleasure
of revisiting the magazine pieces and savoring my favorite passages.
Do you foresee a time
when your enthusiasm for The New Yorker
will wane and you’ll stop making these lists?
No. I’m totally hooked on The New Yorker. If anything, my addiction is intensifying.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)